Skip to main content

Are You Smart Enough To Be a NFL 1st Round Pick?


Recently, it was made public that team representatives were asking prospective NFL players during the combine questions about their sexual orientation. Some were asked if they were heterosexual, with one player stating that he was asked, "do you like girls?"

As the NFL investigates the situations, the recent allegations have stirred up controversy and debate. Some say that teams should be allowed to do so in hopes of selecting the right player to mesh within their existing team locker room. Others claim that the question was that of psychology in which a question is tossed out to force the brain away from stock answers the responder has prepared. And finally, of course, many wonder why it would matter, since such a question is illegal within the realms of a job interview.

Personally, I'm in the majority. Why should it matter? One of the beautiful things about sports is that regardless of what you look like, where you come from, who you love, or even any character quirks you might have, the only question should be - can you play? 

That's the way it was growing up playing in the driveway, the streets and the parks, and that is the way it is in the big arenas and stadiums. Can you play?

This is why I find the NFL's propensity to make the combine (now another television event) a big deal really tough to take seriously. These players who are just a number (literally) and treated like pieces of meat aren't  enough reasons to garner negative feedback, but they then include these ridiculous tests as if any of it actually matters. None of it is particularly relevant, and none of it carries any type of scientific surety. 

Can you play? 

And because there are some large financial responsibility tied to the selection, a personal interview and background check is surely acceptable. 




But for the heck of it, let's just assume you, the reader, are a top quarterback prospect from [your choice of school]. Regardless of whatever accomplishments you've achieved in the collegiate ranks, and even if you lucked out on a good day and maxed out on all of the 40 yard dashes, long jumps, high jumps, bench reps, and all of the other ridiculous activities they force you through (sounds like a Crossfit challenge, doesn't it?), it comes down to answering these stupid questions the correct way. 

When choosing teams down at the local Y, no captain says, "excuse me, can you quickly answer these three questions?"

In fact, how many times do the fastest and strongest guys translate to the on-field/court performance of that particular sport? Not very often. Actually, it's very unlikely.

So, here goes. The following link is a website that offers a mini Wonderlic Test (used in NFL combine). It is 15 questions, and you have three minutes and thirty-six seconds (very odd time) to answer them all. The test will grade your answers, and even give you a comparison to an NFL player's score. 


Are you smart enough to be an NFL 1st round pick? 

If you're like me, you'll know that it shouldn't matter. Can you play is still the main question, with your character being the deciding factor on whether you are a candidate.

Recently Read

Would You Rather: Questions 121-130

This edition of "Would You Rather" is credited to the NBA Would You Rather NBA Account on Instagram ( See Here ). Adding to the fun, this edition (and possibly future ones) are all NBA basketball questions.  121. Who would you rather have on your favorite NBA team - Giannis Antetokounpo or James Harden?  Seeing how I'm a lifelong suffering Knicks fan, the thought of any of these guys in blue and orange is hard to believe. With that said, I'm taking the Greek Freak for this reason - I enjoy watching him play a bit more. Nothing against Harden who is amazing as well, but at times, the ball sticks and that isn't always fun. Plus, I feel like we haven't yet seen a finished Giannis. 122. Would you rather have Giannis Antetokounpo with no driving ability or James Harden with no Three-Point shooting ability?  This is definitely a weird and unique one, but I'll take Harden. Giannis without his strength doesn't offer much. However, if Harden's d...

Dome Pondering Movie Review: In a Relationship (2018)

What is it about?  Following the progression of two couples over the course of a summer.  Who is in it? Emma Roberts - Hallie Michael Ambrano - Owen Dree Hemingway - Willa Patrick Gibson - Matt Favorite Scene:  [Spoiler Alert] Matt and Villa sit on the stairs, and he admits to not wanting to introduce Willa to his parents.  Favorite Quote:  I don't... I don't think you ever find someone... you don't resent. And that's part of it. It's just... find the person you *want* to resent, you know. Review:  This was a weird film. The opener had much promise, but as the film continued, it felt like it was just getting longer.  My biggest gripe with the film is that I liked each of the characters less as I got to know them. I understand that the film attempted to highlight the modern relationship for a specific generation, and in certain ways, it succeeded in doing so. However, the characters never grew or became better people from their relationships...they just...

Thoughts on TNA on AMC Debut: "Yup, TNA is back. It is so back."

TNA is back.  And I know that because it is heavily under scrutiny by the internet. But that criticism comes with being back on a major platform like the AMC Network, and of course, taking the next step after a super successful 2025.  So, what did I think?  The show was...ummmm okay, at best. Some of the challenges the company faced heading into this weekend were well documented among the rumor mill, which didn't bode well for the company. In balancing reported visa issues with talent, pivoting after losing core talent to free agency, and attempting to build and manage talent workload with a premium live event on Saturday, TNA found themselves in the usual TNA stuff. The most peculiar - and strangest - of situations to be in going into a big network premiere. This company, man! All in all, again, the show was okay. It had its flaws. It had some cool moments. It didn't live up to the hype (or the expectations we each had for such a premiere). But it's one show. TNA has put...