Skip to main content

Obama's Hope And Change Seeming Like Same Ol' Politics

It was a bold statement by the current leader of the free world.

A statement that no other President has even made - ever.

A statement that was sure to spark debate and controversy - and has.

And with President Obama’s recent endorsement for same-sex marriage, it signifies (at least its supposed to) a growing change in our society on so many fronts. And most importantly, it has really changed the outlook of the 2012 Presidential election.

As I’ve stated several times here on the DP, I’m not a fan of politics. I don’t get wrapped up in parties, sides, teams, colors, or any other way or boundary the political process seems to have. I’m registered as an Independent. I don’t vote strictly Republican because it’s what is deemed as the “Christian’s party” (which is complete garbage). Nor do I vote Democratic because it is viewed as the “working class” party (Also, lots of garbage). I also don't "vote Obama" because of the color of his skin.

In fact, you’re reading the words of a man that has voted for President Bush’s re-election, and for President Barack Obama in the previous election. So yes, call me naive, but I believe in voting for the right man for the job.


However, after viewing and reading the transcript of President’ Obama’s interview, it does leave my vote for this year’s election without a home. A vote that was once assured to be punched under Obama’s name, I now am left to at least view the other options.

I know what you are thinking.

Are you really going to let one viewpoint dictate your vote?

And for others, I also know what you are now thinking. 

How can you be against same-sex marriage?

First, no, there one viewpoint will not dictate my vote.

And yes, I am against same-sex marriages, and I have been from the beginning.

Somehow, in today's rapid-fire culture, when you are against same-sex marriage all of a sudden it makes you some type of gay basher, homophobic, or  an outright bigot. If that's the way you want to spin it as well, that is fine. You might as well stop reading this post. However, my sole reasoning is I believe in God. I believe in the Bible, it's words, and what it says. For me, it's as simple as that. And while I am willing to admit, there are evangelical extremists and even some churches that ruin the credibility of this side's argument, there are just as much individuals that are pro same-sex marriage because they fear public and societal scrutiny and/or conviction, or it's simply the cool "oppressive" issue to battle for.

For what it's worth, even though I am a Christian individual that is anti-same sex marriage in this debate, let me just say no one wishes any ill will towards homosexuals, and/or same-sex couples.

However, as I've said in the past, I'd love to intelligently and unbiasedly have some questions answered by a member of the gay community one day.

Nonetheless, there are so many issues at the helm that need to be addressed regarding our nation, that the sudden emergence of same-sex marriages seems nothing more than a way to drum up votes from a younger generation. A generation that indeed aided greatly in getting President Obama elected. For some reason, even if the President was honest in his feelings, it all seems like a well-timed political stunt. And I find it odd, that a president that ran on said Christian principles, going as far as having Rick Warren present for his inauguration, that he would come to such a conclusion at this very time. 

It's more than the same-sex issue, but the issue of changing. One of President Obama's greatest values, and the slogan he ran on last time, was the element of change. We needed it at the time. This country still is in need of change. However, it seems like recently, with a lack of focus on jobs and domestic issues, as promised, the President is the one that has changed.

And as I sit here punching the keys, I take a look at the other side, the red side, so to speak, and I'm completely repulsed. From the beginning of the Republican primary, Mitt Romney has been my least favorite of the candidates of the Republican party (for the record, Santorum was my pick). From his arrogant comment and wager challenge of "ten grand" as he put it during the Iowa debates, to his below-the-belt tactics at President Obama, and his constant and palpable flip-flopping on important American topics, I find it very hard pressed to give a vote to Romney. And that's without including the personal "car-salesman" vibe I get from him.

Is same-sex marriage an issue in our nation. Of course.

However, not one that should dictate the vote of an election.

Unfortunately, President Obama doesn't think so.

Either way, what was looking like another exciting November of hope and change, is now looking like the typical run-of-the-mill election day.

Picking the lesser of the two evils.

Some hope and change...

Recently Read

Would You Rather: Questions 121-130

This edition of "Would You Rather" is credited to the NBA Would You Rather NBA Account on Instagram ( See Here ). Adding to the fun, this edition (and possibly future ones) are all NBA basketball questions.  121. Who would you rather have on your favorite NBA team - Giannis Antetokounpo or James Harden?  Seeing how I'm a lifelong suffering Knicks fan, the thought of any of these guys in blue and orange is hard to believe. With that said, I'm taking the Greek Freak for this reason - I enjoy watching him play a bit more. Nothing against Harden who is amazing as well, but at times, the ball sticks and that isn't always fun. Plus, I feel like we haven't yet seen a finished Giannis. 122. Would you rather have Giannis Antetokounpo with no driving ability or James Harden with no Three-Point shooting ability?  This is definitely a weird and unique one, but I'll take Harden. Giannis without his strength doesn't offer much. However, if Harden's d...

Yankees Postseason 2026, Wild Card vs. Boston Red Sox

And we're back with another one of these read-along series. It wasn't too long ago that I found myself writing every other night as my Knicks marched their way to an NBA Championship.  Man, that still feels so good to indulge in.  But here we are on a similar journey for the Yankees.  Call me crazy, but I'm just not buying that the World Series is confirmed for anyone. Baseball has been weird all year, and part of said weirdness has been the parity, or dreadfulness - however you want to look at it - around MLB. In my opinion, the Yankees' pitching depth gives them a legit chance.  And with a lockout looming, 2027 might not present another chance. Why you gotta go there, man? I'm just saying... --- Game 1 Yankees d. Red Sox, 9-0 (Yankees lead Series, 1-0) Cam Schlittler is amazing. I sat on my sofa last year in Game 3 of the Wild Card between these two very rivaled teams and it felt like that dude was the best pitcher in the world. For the moment and game, it just fe...

Yankees Postseason 2026, ALDS vs. Rays

This is easily the most anticipated series (and most expected?) for the New York Yankees. The two best teams during the regular season were expected to clash to determine American League prominence.  And yes, I agree that this upcoming series says a lot about the broken playoff structure in MLB. Allow me to step onto my soapbox for a mere moment... Up we go... I've never been a fan of the expansion to six teams per league. I understand that it keeps more markets in the playoff picture come September, and it is more revenue for all (likely, the biggest reason for the expansion). Still, all it did was create a scenario where division winners were at a disadvantage, and what we're getting here is the two best teams in the league facing off in a five-game series.  Ultimately, the Tampa Bay Rays, the top seed in the American League, are given the second-best record in their first-round, in a best-of-five?  None of this makes sense.  Stepping off now... Nonetheless, fellow...