Skip to main content

Mayweather vs. Pacquiao Reaction


I've been very critical of the sport of boxing over the years and I truly believe that last night's fight supports my frustration. I miss the days when boxing was not just a big deal - like last night's fight - but was also a draw and interest moving forward. When titles meant something and when fans were a priority.

Sure, things have changed, and I'm not blaming either Mayweather or Pacquiao, but I really, really, really, reaaaaaaaaaaaalllllly believe that last night's fight put another nail in the coffin of boxing causal interest and pay-per-view as we know it. 

Was I disappointed? No. I had friends over, reveld in the social/pop culture aspect of the fight for a bit, had a good time, and enjoyed what there was of the packed sports day (Kentucky Derby, Spurs/Clippers) as well as this fight. My biggest disappointment is more so what this means for the sport moving forward. Actually, check that, it was Jamie Foxx's rendition of our national anthem. That was awful. Like really bad.

Nonetheless, for me, this was your standard Mayweather fight. I wasn't blindsided or had high expectations, because he fought his fight - defense and accuracy. The hype may have fooled non-fans and casual fans into expecting some type of all-out brawl between two guys who hated one another which was far from reality. It's probably why both are $300M richer this morning. 

I understand those who have issues with Mayweather, from his issues with domestic abuse, his arrogance/confidence (take your pick), or his love of money. However, again, any argument towards Mayweather "dodging" or "not fighting" is ill-advised. Especially, when he landed 60+ more punches than Pacquiao. 

Also, it felt like Pacquiao fell into the same pace other fighters do against Mayweather. I truly was expecting him to bring his more aggressive style against Mayweather. In many aspects, this fight looked five years too late. Another issue with boxing. 

In the end, last night's fight will be known for nothing else than the hype, the money, and the overall disappointment. Which truly is a shame, and a far cry from other notable fights, i.e. "Rumble in the Jungle" with top billing and hype. 

To me, this fight further hurt the sport of boxing by discouraging casual fans and others who were disappointed by the overall entertainment value of the fight. After this fight, what else is there? Who else is there? Can any boxing fan trust to get their money's worth on an event purchase? Will any casual EVER trust another purchase? Especially when the undercard was just as lackluster and one-sided. If the pay-per-view concept wasn't in jeopardy already, it will be moving forward. 

Sure, boxing may have raked it in last night, but it might have been at the risk of its future. Congrats to Mayweather and Pacquiao. But this fight may have been the very last one, for a long time, that anyone cares about. And sadly, it wasn't even memorable. 

Recently Read

Would You Rather: Questions 121-130

This edition of "Would You Rather" is credited to the NBA Would You Rather NBA Account on Instagram ( See Here ). Adding to the fun, this edition (and possibly future ones) are all NBA basketball questions.  121. Who would you rather have on your favorite NBA team - Giannis Antetokounpo or James Harden?  Seeing how I'm a lifelong suffering Knicks fan, the thought of any of these guys in blue and orange is hard to believe. With that said, I'm taking the Greek Freak for this reason - I enjoy watching him play a bit more. Nothing against Harden who is amazing as well, but at times, the ball sticks and that isn't always fun. Plus, I feel like we haven't yet seen a finished Giannis. 122. Would you rather have Giannis Antetokounpo with no driving ability or James Harden with no Three-Point shooting ability?  This is definitely a weird and unique one, but I'll take Harden. Giannis without his strength doesn't offer much. However, if Harden's d...

Yankees Postseason 2026, ALDS vs. Rays

This is easily the most anticipated series (and most expected?) for the New York Yankees. The two best teams during the regular season were expected to clash to determine American League prominence.  And yes, I agree that this upcoming series says a lot about the broken playoff structure in MLB. Allow me to step onto my soapbox for a mere moment... Up we go... I've never been a fan of the expansion to six teams per league. I understand that it keeps more markets in the playoff picture come September, and it is more revenue for all (likely, the biggest reason for the expansion). Still, all it did was create a scenario where division winners were at a disadvantage, and what we're getting here is the two best teams in the league facing off in a five-game series.  Ultimately, the Tampa Bay Rays, the top seed in the American League, are given the second-best record in their first-round, in a best-of-five?  None of this makes sense.  Stepping off now... Nonetheless, fellow...

Yankees Postseason 2026, Wild Card vs. Boston Red Sox

And we're back with another one of these read-along series. It wasn't too long ago that I found myself writing every other night as my Knicks marched their way to an NBA Championship.  Man, that still feels so good to indulge in.  But here we are on a similar journey for the Yankees.  Call me crazy, but I'm just not buying that the World Series is confirmed for anyone. Baseball has been weird all year, and part of said weirdness has been the parity, or dreadfulness - however you want to look at it - around MLB. In my opinion, the Yankees' pitching depth gives them a legit chance.  And with a lockout looming, 2027 might not present another chance. Why you gotta go there, man? I'm just saying... --- Game 1 Yankees d. Red Sox, 9-0 (Yankees lead Series, 1-0) Cam Schlittler is amazing. I sat on my sofa last year in Game 3 of the Wild Card between these two very rivaled teams and it felt like that dude was the best pitcher in the world. For the moment and game, it just fe...