Skip to main content

Passing on Auto-Walk Rule


I very much dislike the idea of the automatic walk, baseball's new rule as part of the initiative to improve pace of play. Yes, I am all for increasing the pace of play, always have been, and I am a fan of the new commissioner researching and searching for ways to effectively help the game of baseball. As I've been saying, this is the first time baseball has been proactive, and I love it. 

But this new rule approved by both the MLB and the MLBPA (Important aspect to remember), in my opinion, doesn't solve that. In some ways, I think it takes away from the game. Here are some of my reasons:

Reward For Doing Nothing

In what sport - ever - is an action done on the field by simply asking for it? There is no play or action to dictate the result with the auto walk, just a mere sign of the four fingers, and a player will walk from the on-deck circle to first base. WHAT?! 

It's rare, but forcing a pitcher to not have a brain fart and deliver four solid throws outside of the hitters circle is part of the game. The bypass feels cheap, and that shouldn't be a word associated with baseball. 

Natural Drama

What's better than the intentional walk happening, and allowing the drama to build off an anticipated matchup between the pitcher on the mound and the hitter in the on-deck circle? It's such a pivotal element to the ebb and flow of the built-in drama and entertainment of a baseball game. Now, we won't get those few seconds of organic build to what is sure to be a key moment in the ball game. 

Penny Saving 

Yes, intentional walks are down, but is this really the answer? For me, "pace of play" is not necessarily just about saving time, but it's about eliminating moments in the game that are simply "dead periods". As I just stated, these few seconds aren't exactly that. So really, what are we saving here? 

Further Promotes Intentional Walks 

This may sound weird, but I find intentional walks to be an unfortunate part of baseball. I know, I know...it's strategy, and it's part of the game. But there is a part of me that feels like it robs fans of seeing some of the games' best players do what they do best. The impact a player makes on the overall game is already minimal compared to the other sports, the intentional walk simply lessens that. And now, there is more incentive to do so without...you know, having to do anything. 

I'm all for updated changes. But this is one I'm willing to give the signal to pass on.

Recently Read

Would You Rather: Questions 121-130

This edition of "Would You Rather" is credited to the NBA Would You Rather NBA Account on Instagram ( See Here ). Adding to the fun, this edition (and possibly future ones) are all NBA basketball questions.  121. Who would you rather have on your favorite NBA team - Giannis Antetokounpo or James Harden?  Seeing how I'm a lifelong suffering Knicks fan, the thought of any of these guys in blue and orange is hard to believe. With that said, I'm taking the Greek Freak for this reason - I enjoy watching him play a bit more. Nothing against Harden who is amazing as well, but at times, the ball sticks and that isn't always fun. Plus, I feel like we haven't yet seen a finished Giannis. 122. Would you rather have Giannis Antetokounpo with no driving ability or James Harden with no Three-Point shooting ability?  This is definitely a weird and unique one, but I'll take Harden. Giannis without his strength doesn't offer much. However, if Harden's d...

Dome Pondering Movie Review: In a Relationship (2018)

What is it about?  Following the progression of two couples over the course of a summer.  Who is in it? Emma Roberts - Hallie Michael Ambrano - Owen Dree Hemingway - Willa Patrick Gibson - Matt Favorite Scene:  [Spoiler Alert] Matt and Villa sit on the stairs, and he admits to not wanting to introduce Willa to his parents.  Favorite Quote:  I don't... I don't think you ever find someone... you don't resent. And that's part of it. It's just... find the person you *want* to resent, you know. Review:  This was a weird film. The opener had much promise, but as the film continued, it felt like it was just getting longer.  My biggest gripe with the film is that I liked each of the characters less as I got to know them. I understand that the film attempted to highlight the modern relationship for a specific generation, and in certain ways, it succeeded in doing so. However, the characters never grew or became better people from their relationships...they just...

Thoughts on TNA on AMC Debut: "Yup, TNA is back. It is so back."

TNA is back.  And I know that because it is heavily under scrutiny by the internet. But that criticism comes with being back on a major platform like the AMC Network, and of course, taking the next step after a super successful 2025.  So, what did I think?  The show was...ummmm okay, at best. Some of the challenges the company faced heading into this weekend were well documented among the rumor mill, which didn't bode well for the company. In balancing reported visa issues with talent, pivoting after losing core talent to free agency, and attempting to build and manage talent workload with a premium live event on Saturday, TNA found themselves in the usual TNA stuff. The most peculiar - and strangest - of situations to be in going into a big network premiere. This company, man! All in all, again, the show was okay. It had its flaws. It had some cool moments. It didn't live up to the hype (or the expectations we each had for such a premiere). But it's one show. TNA has put...