Skip to main content

Erasing the Lines (again) Within the War

So, we need more troops?

How much more?

22,000?

No big deal right? Well, President Bush doesn't seem to think so. In his latest address to the nation on the status of the war in Iraq, President Bush unveiled his new plan which centers around increasing the number of troops deployed to Iraq. A plan which is very controversial and seems questionable even amongst republicans and the most fervent Bush supporters.

President Bush's new plan calls for an additional 22,000 troops in Iraq to cover "mistakes" from the previous operation. The troops will be used to protect already safe areas, and to protect the Iraqi border. Bush also calls for effort from Iraq and claims that under the new plan, American forces will fight alongside Iraqi forces. Bush said that, "failure in Iraq would be a disaster for the United States. A democratic Iraq will not be perfect. But it will be a country that fights terrorists instead of harboring them." To ensure that this will hapen, President Bush's plan will call for an additional $1 Billion dollars of funding.

Hmmm...

Yours truly has never been a strong supporter of any specific political affiliation. I've agreed and disagreed with many political decisions, but have always trusted the judgement of our elected officials. Nonetheless, the war in Iraq has been a topic that has slowly erased the line that seperates political parties. In 2003, the War in Iraq began and saw an astounding 76% of the United States in agreement for the war. Whether you were a republican, democrat or an independant, 9/11 lingered in your memory, and doing whatever it took to rid God's green earth of "evil doers" was necessary. However, as the years progressed, the war began to take a turn for which divided the parties again. Topics of fatalities, economy, oil, war, and homeland security questioned the purpose, ethics, and benefits of the war. In 2004, 61% were in favor of the war; 2005, 50%; 2006, 39%; and finally here in 2007, 26%.

After splitting the nation in half in 2005, the lines are beginning to dissapear once again, this time in favor of ending this "war" and to begin decreasing our troops in Iraq. Here in 2007, those lines of seperation are erased again for the obvious decision, this time in favor of returning our troops home.

By aiding Iraq with more funding and more troops decreases the responsibility, development and functioning of Iraq, it's government, and it's people. Not to mention the risk of increasing American casualties in the process. The United States can put $1 billion to productive use here at home.

Republican, Democrat or Independent- we all show the same consensus for this plan.

For the first time ever, I am afraid, and truly question what our leaders are doing.

Recently Read

Would You Rather: Questions 121-130

This edition of "Would You Rather" is credited to the NBA Would You Rather NBA Account on Instagram ( See Here ). Adding to the fun, this edition (and possibly future ones) are all NBA basketball questions.  121. Who would you rather have on your favorite NBA team - Giannis Antetokounpo or James Harden?  Seeing how I'm a lifelong suffering Knicks fan, the thought of any of these guys in blue and orange is hard to believe. With that said, I'm taking the Greek Freak for this reason - I enjoy watching him play a bit more. Nothing against Harden who is amazing as well, but at times, the ball sticks and that isn't always fun. Plus, I feel like we haven't yet seen a finished Giannis. 122. Would you rather have Giannis Antetokounpo with no driving ability or James Harden with no Three-Point shooting ability?  This is definitely a weird and unique one, but I'll take Harden. Giannis without his strength doesn't offer much. However, if Harden's d...

Knicks Postseason 2026, NBA Finals vs. San Antonio Spurs

Part of me is in disbelief that we are here...the other part is raging and ready to go. Four more wins! Let's. GO! So much of this NBA Finals feels poetic, historical, and dream-worthy, for so many reasons, to so many different parties. This includes the NBA office. I'm sure they are loving this matchup for their biggest stage.  While defeating the Spurs does exercise some demons from 1999, I'm not sure I care about that at all. As noted from my thoughts in the Eastern Conference Finals, at this point, just win. Review Thoughts from Round 1 Review Thoughts from Round 2 Review Thoughts from Eastern Conference Finals Just. Win.  I don't care who the opponent is. The narrative that comes with it, or how we do it.  Just. Win. The NBA Cup win seems like whiteboard material for them, yet a serving example for us to match up with them. Again, it doesn't matter. Both teams are completely different beasts since November, through growth and experience.  This all comes down to...

Knicks Postseason 2026, Conference Finals vs. Cleveland Cavaliers

It feels like forever since we've played.  But we've got our opponent, and it's go time!  Review Thoughts from Round 1 Review Thoughts from Round 2 Like every other Knick fan, I too hoped for a seven-game series between the Detroit Pistons and the Cleveland Cavaliers, and that's what we got. The long series added time for our squad to rest up (get healthy, OG!) and more time to scout exactly what we'll have to deal with in the Eastern Conference Finals.  We've been here before, and a trip to the NBA Finals once again feels all too close. All too real!  The Cavaliers present some interesting dynamics with their electric backcourt and the size up front with Evan Mobley and Jarrett Allen. There are also two players on the roster, Dennis Schroder and Max Strus, who often find ways to stick it to the Knicks. Sam Merrill seems like the kind of guy who would join that group in this series.  Nonetheless, the Knicks are on a historic run. The Cavs have been knocking on t...