Skip to main content

Erasing the Lines (again) Within the War

So, we need more troops?

How much more?

22,000?

No big deal right? Well, President Bush doesn't seem to think so. In his latest address to the nation on the status of the war in Iraq, President Bush unveiled his new plan which centers around increasing the number of troops deployed to Iraq. A plan which is very controversial and seems questionable even amongst republicans and the most fervent Bush supporters.

President Bush's new plan calls for an additional 22,000 troops in Iraq to cover "mistakes" from the previous operation. The troops will be used to protect already safe areas, and to protect the Iraqi border. Bush also calls for effort from Iraq and claims that under the new plan, American forces will fight alongside Iraqi forces. Bush said that, "failure in Iraq would be a disaster for the United States. A democratic Iraq will not be perfect. But it will be a country that fights terrorists instead of harboring them." To ensure that this will hapen, President Bush's plan will call for an additional $1 Billion dollars of funding.

Hmmm...

Yours truly has never been a strong supporter of any specific political affiliation. I've agreed and disagreed with many political decisions, but have always trusted the judgement of our elected officials. Nonetheless, the war in Iraq has been a topic that has slowly erased the line that seperates political parties. In 2003, the War in Iraq began and saw an astounding 76% of the United States in agreement for the war. Whether you were a republican, democrat or an independant, 9/11 lingered in your memory, and doing whatever it took to rid God's green earth of "evil doers" was necessary. However, as the years progressed, the war began to take a turn for which divided the parties again. Topics of fatalities, economy, oil, war, and homeland security questioned the purpose, ethics, and benefits of the war. In 2004, 61% were in favor of the war; 2005, 50%; 2006, 39%; and finally here in 2007, 26%.

After splitting the nation in half in 2005, the lines are beginning to dissapear once again, this time in favor of ending this "war" and to begin decreasing our troops in Iraq. Here in 2007, those lines of seperation are erased again for the obvious decision, this time in favor of returning our troops home.

By aiding Iraq with more funding and more troops decreases the responsibility, development and functioning of Iraq, it's government, and it's people. Not to mention the risk of increasing American casualties in the process. The United States can put $1 billion to productive use here at home.

Republican, Democrat or Independent- we all show the same consensus for this plan.

For the first time ever, I am afraid, and truly question what our leaders are doing.

Recent Favorites

Wanting the Alternate Route For Bronny James

Welcome to the NBA, Bronny James!  In what was the worst-kept novelty of a storyline in the sports world in LeBron and Bronny one day gracing the NBA together, we're finally here!  First, congrats to Bronny! Entering the NBA is incredibly difficult, especially more than ever considering its global reach. Regardless, he is now part of the fraternity and amongst the elite in the game. Haters will say what they want, but he's there.  And second, congratulations to LeBron and Savannah James. What will be lost in all of this is that they raised a strong young man who yes, took advantage of his access and genetics, and is now at this point in his life - his ultimate goal. Bronny at the core, had no reason to want this - none. He easily could have rested, relaxed, and enjoyed the spoils of this birth lottery. Instead, he wanted what h knew would be the shadow of a massive legacy - and still did the work. That takes guts.  I commend the kid for not resting on Dad's name and wealth.

Thoughts on First 2024 Presidential Debate

It’s the most unwanted rematch likely in history. Biden vs. Trump What we saw tonight was exactly what many moderates expected and solidified what we didn’t want to say out loud - we have to have better options than these two, no? There isn’t much to say about this debate, especially from this debate nerd. This was the absolute shits in regards to inspiring a nation for an upcoming election season, which in many ways, still resonates with political fatigue from 2020. But you know that, already. You knew that ten minutes into the debate. The two best quotes I’ve come across to wrap up my overall feeling are the following: On one side it’s hell no, and on the other, it’s oh no. It’s who we shouldn’t have be President vs. who we can’t let be President A few more quick thoughts on last night 1st Presidential Debate:  - For me, this format was the biggest positive of the night and a very good baseline for where future political debates need to go. In a world of “takes” and who shouts the lo

2024 Stanley Cup Playoffs Keeps Me Casual on Hockey

It's been a long time since I've talked hockey on this.  Wait! Huh? Come again? Yes, hockey. In fact, the last time I posted anything, I was mesmerized by the 2014 Stanley Cup Finals between the Los Angeles Kings and the New York Rangers.  Fast forward to 2024, and my hockey fandom took another step forward. For years I've been the admitted casual. And you know what, I'm okay with that. Unfortunately, my unconditional love fandom for my New York Knicks presents a conflict that will forever curtail anything serious from happening between hockey and myself.  Nonetheless, I felt like this post-season heightened my hockey fandom to another level. Hockey is amazingly awesome. I very much enjoyed the Stanley Cup Playoffs, caught myself choosing Rangers games over early April Yankees baseball, and overall, found myself playing NHL 24 on the ol' Playstation 4.  Yeah, I fell hard. But before I shelf my spring fling with hockey until April 2025, here are just a few quick pon