Skip to main content

MLB Expansion & Realignment, Maybe?


A possible change is coming to Major League Baseball! 

That statement alone has triggered every baseball fan into their feelings, and what possibly could Rob Manfred have cooking for the game's future? As he's done before, Manfred dropped yet another controversial nugget, this time regarding possible expansion and realignment for MLB in the future. 

To begin, I don't think this is set in stone...yet. I truly believe, like the "Golden Bat" rule was mentioned, Manfred is floating this out there to gauge the reception of it from fans and how it plays in the overall fan-o-sphere of sports discourse. 

Second, I believe this is also a strategy for upcoming labor discussions. Everyone is geared up for the inevitable doom that is "to salary cap" or "not to salary cap". Work stoppage is likely, but a gentle early toss on the table of possibly adding more jobs for players can't be overlooked in labor negitoations. 

Expansion

Let's start here, as realignment doesn't work without it. 

I'm not a fan. 

I know it's easy to get wrapped up in new things, and new cities, and ballparks, and everything else, but I genuinely believe MLB has a major competition problem. A huge competition problem, actually. Adding two more teams to that issue only exacerbates the problem. 

There are a lot of teams that can barely compete, won't compete, or don't have the talent to compete. 

However, I understand that the overall vision is indeed to lean into baseball's natural regional focus, which I do think is a positive. From TV start times to being able to stack games for fans to see (see: NFL and NBA), according to time zones, there is a lot that can be done. Baseball has been great in spite of itself in these areas. 

The snarkiness in me is more so like - can we get the Athletics and Rays figured out?! But eh...

So, for the sake of realignment, getting baseball to that new model, I guess I'll be on board. 

Realignment

Anyone advocating against this realignment because of American League and National League traditions needs to check themselves. There is nothing that separates the leagues anymore. Nothing. Sorry traditionalists, or people who don't like change, because...

However, for the sake of compromise and carrying some sort of legacy through the fabric of your sport, I think keeping the leagues would be a nice touch (more on that in a bit) in getting this over with ALL demographics.

My biggest support for this realignment is simply this: MLB's playoff format is awful. 

Every league discusses making the regular season more important, yet expands playoffs for revenue. The current MLB system penalizes a division winner by making them play a Wild Card. It's all sorts of wonky and unfair, and overall, it reduces the urgency of divisional play. 

I'm down for the eight divisions with four teams. 

The proposal I'm not in favor of is a popular one (of course) via Jim Bowden:


I know the radicalness of this excites quite a few people. That Yankees, Phillies, Red Sox, and Mets division is as sexy as it comes in baseball. However, I'm not sure having a handful of your flagship (and large-market) teams eliminated from the postseason based on structure is a good idea. 

Just my opinion. 

Negatives:
  • We will fully embrace East and West conferences. You might as well scrap the league names if they carry no tradition. 
  • With East and West, you eventually have to eliminate the separate Awards, which are sort of silly now (e.g. AL & NL MVP). Moving to MLB MVP, MLB Cy Young, etc...will likely be the transition. Again, too much, too soon. 
  • No more Cubs vs. Cardinals? Huh?
  • I'm not sure if Chicago and New York are ready for Yankees vs. Mets and White Sox vs. Cubs frequently. Ugh...talk radio! 
The positives:
  • It's likely the best structure geographically of all the options out there. 
There is this option from Fox Sports that moves the needle a bit closer: 


Negatives:
  • American League and National League in name only. None of the teams involved resembles the traditions of the old leagues. You might as well scrap it though I appreciate the attempt to include it. 
  • Aren't the A's moving to Las Vegas? Shouldn't they be in the NL Southwest? I know it's not perfect, but that seems like it can be fixed, no?
  • I find the division names to be so cheesy. "AL Great Lakes"? Ugh...
Positives:
  • This outlook preserves more of the deep-rooted rivalries that were nixed in Bowden's proposal, specifically Cubs vs. Cardinals. 
  • It's better than Bowden's...I guess.
And finally, the proposal I'm rocking with right now via The Athletic: 


Negatives: 
  • Some regions have a bit more travel than others. But that's inevitable considering the cities in play. 
Positives:
  • Minimal damage while preserving some tradition and records. The Rockies are moving to the AL - maybe the change will help. They need a change. Hey, it worked for the Houston Astros. 
  • A Seattle Mariners vs. Portland Baseball team would be an instant rivalry (see: Sounders vs. Timbers in MLS). 
  • Things seem orderly in this one.
Okay, dude, thanks for your opinion! 

Ultimately, here is what I would like to see if expansion and realignment come to fruition: 
  • Cover Them! - Both expansion teams added retractable roofs. It shouldve have been mandated for all in the latest wave of stadiums being built. Rainouts are not friendly in today's entertainment space. 
  • Talkin' About Playoffs!? - It hasn't been discussed much, but it does seem like we're moving to a 16-team playoff format. Ugh...I hope not. Half the league seems like a lot! 
  • Location, Location - I don't have as strong an opinion on which cities are granted expansion. It does feel like Nashville is a lock with Portland and Utah as the favorites out West. There is always the put baseball back in Montreal! crowd. I just hope for sound leadership for both.  If I'm being too honest, I would say give Oakland back its team. You know what, ditch Vegas and just give them their team back. Just saying...
  • Thread the Game - As noted, I'm pulling for The Athletic's model. It's important in this realignment to balance not just the future, but the past as well. 
  • No more Interleague - I'll go one step further and say, remove interleague play going forward. It reignites the All-Star Game and makes the Pennants feel special, as well as the World Series. 
  • Unbalanced - Unbalanced schedules once again should be in place - I'm fine with upwards of 19 games in-division once again. 
All in all, this entire post might be for nothing. It's fun to think about. We'll see where it goes. But hopefully (and more importantly), we get a labor agreement in place very soon. 

When is Manfred dropping that nugget for all of us to run with?

Recently Read

Would You Rather: Questions 121-130

This edition of "Would You Rather" is credited to the NBA Would You Rather NBA Account on Instagram ( See Here ). Adding to the fun, this edition (and possibly future ones) are all NBA basketball questions.  121. Who would you rather have on your favorite NBA team - Giannis Antetokounpo or James Harden?  Seeing how I'm a lifelong suffering Knicks fan, the thought of any of these guys in blue and orange is hard to believe. With that said, I'm taking the Greek Freak for this reason - I enjoy watching him play a bit more. Nothing against Harden who is amazing as well, but at times, the ball sticks and that isn't always fun. Plus, I feel like we haven't yet seen a finished Giannis. 122. Would you rather have Giannis Antetokounpo with no driving ability or James Harden with no Three-Point shooting ability?  This is definitely a weird and unique one, but I'll take Harden. Giannis without his strength doesn't offer much. However, if Harden's d...

Knicks Postseason 2026, Conference Finals vs. Cleveland Cavaliers

It feels like forever since we've played.  But we've got our opponent, and it's go time!  Review Thoughts from Round 1 Review Thoughts from Round 2 Like every other Knick fan, I too hoped for a seven-game series between the Detroit Pistons and the Cleveland Cavaliers, and that's what we got. The long series added time for our squad to rest up (get healthy, OG!) and more time to scout exactly what we'll have to deal with in the Eastern Conference Finals.  We've been here before, and a trip to the NBA Finals once again feels all too close. All too real!  The Cavaliers present some interesting dynamics with their electric backcourt and the size up front with Evan Mobley and Jarrett Allen. There are also two players on the roster, Dennis Schroder and Max Strus, who often find ways to stick it to the Knicks. Sam Merrill seems like the kind of guy who would join that group in this series.  Nonetheless, the Knicks are on a historic run. The Cavs have been knocking on t...

Knicks Postseason 2026, NBA Finals vs. San Antonio Spurs

Part of me is in disbelief that we are here...the other part is raging and ready to go. Four more wins! Let's. GO! So much of this NBA Finals feels poetic, historical, and dream-worthy, for so many reasons, to so many different parties. This includes the NBA office. I'm sure they are loving this matchup for their biggest stage.  While defeating the Spurs does exercise some demons from 1999, I'm not sure I care about that at all. As noted from my thoughts in the Eastern Conference Finals, at this point, just win. Review Thoughts from Round 1 Review Thoughts from Round 2 Review Thoughts from Eastern Conference Finals Just. Win.  I don't care who the opponent is. The narrative that comes with it, or how we do it.  Just. Win. The NBA Cup win seems like whiteboard material for them, yet a serving example for us to match up with them. Again, it doesn't matter. Both teams are completely different beasts since November, through growth and experience.  This all comes down to...