Skip to main content

Dome Pondering Movie Review: Funny Games (U.S. 2007)


What it's about?


A film that touches on society's interest for thrill and violence. Two polite, articulate, yet violent psychopaths mentally and physically torture a father, his wife, and their son on their next stop in a spree through numerous vacation homes.

Who is in it?

Naomi Watts - Ann

Tim Roth - George

Michael Pitt - Paul

Brady Corbet - Peter

Devon Gearhart - George Jr.

Favorite Scene


The initial scene when the family arrives to the vacation home. Peter arrives and asks for eggs. Upon receiving the eggs, he asks for another four to take for the neighbors next door. He comes back and claims he is terrified of dogs, and that he broke the eggs. After knocking her cell phone into the sink, he politely asks for four more, and insists that she gives him more eggs. After she declines, he still, politely says she should give him the eggs, because thats all he came for. He continues these mind games until she finally breaks.

Favorite Quote

"You bet that you'll be alive tomorrow at 9 o'clock, and we bet you'll be dead. Okay?"

Review

Funny Games is a remake of the original European version which debuted in 1997. Funny Games is a movie that is very warped in its entirety, yet reveals so much about the American (and human) culture of expecting thrill and violence. The film does leaves the viewer waiting and hanging throughout several scenes with anticipation without any payoff. This is evident in the fact that all murders and violence happen are not visible. The scene either cuts away from the violence, or the camera shot tilts to where the violence cannot be interpreted. This is also portrayed through various scenes where anticipation is built up for a thrill, and no pay off occurs.

The message is sent half-way through the film where you understand the director's purpose and message for the film (A scene where time is rewound). The message is also evident in scenes where the characters break the proverbial "fourth wall", and interacts with the viewer.

The characters are portrayed well, as Naomi Watts does a great job with the character, "Ann", and Michael Pitt and Brady Corbet are overly convincing in their roles as the polite and articulate killers.

Funny Games is an interesting movie if you have some time on your hands. The message of mocking violence and thrill is understood, yet, the lack of payoffs and development can become overkill.

Grade: 2/5

Recent Favorites

Quick Ponder: The Long Way

The long way is, the best way,  if the Lord is on it. 

Sunday Sundown Rundown - 9/15/24

3 Up 1. James Earl Jones - The voice GOAT. But I'll always remember him in one of my favorite movies, Coming to America , in the absolute epic role of King Joffe Joffer. "Where is my son, Akeem!". A great gift to us.   2. A'ja Wilson - The WNBA has entered our mainstream sports landscape because of Caitlin Clark. Yes, that is very true. But there is an amazing talent in A'ja Wilson who continues to dominate, and this week, she set the single-season scoring record and likely will do the same in smashing the single-season rebound record.  3. Inflation Lowest in 3 Years - I know it's a hot-button issue during this election season. BUT! It is the lowest it's been in three years. I'm not crediting or blaming anyone! Just saying! Enjoy the change, y'all.  3 Down 1. Trump Shooting at Golf Course - Look, this is crazy. No matter how you feel about Trump, your thoughts on him as a Presidential candidate, or anything else regarding politics, this should NOT

Thoughts on Second 2024 Presidential Debate

That was soooooooooo much different than what we witnessed in the first debate.  So. Much. Different.  Yet, why does it still feel like not much was impacted? Overall, I stepped away from this debate with the overarching theme that Kamala Harris did what she needed to do. And that was not engage in a pity back-and-forth with Trump who wants to muddy the waters of any debate or discourse, force him to bring something new to the table and force him to get into a policy discussion beyond the usual surface sayings and fire-alarm narratives.  She did that.  For Trump. He has his voters. He is not losing them. But I thought Trump didn't do enough to interest those voters who have soured on him as well as those who are not yet sold on Kamala (this administration, or even the Democratic Party).  We saw the same from Trump. No need to answer questions. Dictate the narrative with what you want. Reply with emotion. Evade policy discussion. And you know, be Trump.  Was there a winner? In a tra