Skip to main content

More Thoughts on Caitlin Clark: "Clark Awoke a Monster In Us"

Let's drop some thoughts and comments on Caitlin Clark, shall we? 

::: enter collective sighs, groans, and eye rolls here :::

I know...

The continued discussion on Clark and her presence as a professional athlete continues to fascinate as well as enrage me. As discussed in an earlier post, what we are experiencing with Clark is the evolved coverage of an athlete, beyond just social media presence in what LeBron James endured, into a place of injecting every intersection of society into the discussion. 

Nope, it cannot just be about basketball (or sports). Because nothing ever is anymore. Ever. 

It's about all of it. Even when it doesn't have to be. So we're going to talk, yell, argue, insinuate, speculate, and what drives me crazy, have discourse in the most irresponsible manner possible. 

The simplest truth to Caitlin Clark's presence is this, there are multiple truths at play. And that's okay! 

Just a few more quick thoughts going forward:

- The most salient one of them all for me is this - Caitlan Clark doesn't deserve the discussion and narrative around her. Yet, she's handled it so gracefully. All at twenty-two years old. 

I'm so incredibly impressed by how she has handled this so far. And that's in the midst of a losing season. For me, that outweighs so much of her on-the-court talent. 


 
- There are a lot of new WNBA fans - and overall, women's basketball fans - who have entered the space and have attempted to make themselves integral parts of the discourse without relying on those who have been there the whole time. There are many media personnel (and personalities) who need to defer and make space for those covering the sport in detail and length, and base their "hot takes" on knowledge, not ratings or surfaced understanding. 

- The most cringe scenes this week have been men, telling women covering this space for years, the direction of women's basketball, what it needs to do, and in some ways, that they should be thankful for this opportunity to have a seat at the table. 

And for some, explaining their absence in the past on the topic with adjacent random allyship for women as reasoning. 

All of it - so cringe. 

- Caitlin Clark's fanbase is amazing. There is power and influence there for sure! Caitlin Clark's fanbase is also delusional and a distraction. Again, the two can be truths. The nuance of new fans wanting to give Clark the immediate platform (in terms of basketball presence) she had in college without earning it is a disservice to Clark. 

This is the best league in the world. Nobody's going to give you anything easy  

            - Breanna Stewart

- Again, yessssssssssssssss! Caitlin Clark is white. She is straight. That is undeniably a huge factor in her popularity. There is nothing wrong with identifying with an athlete if you see yourself in them. Also, yes, you're kidding yourself if you don't think America is...ahem, unfavorable to black, brown, and queer bodies in sports. That (and the entire race discussion) is an indictment of our society. 

So yeah, she's white. White people may love that (or might not admit it). She's popular because the majority race in the country identifies with that in a sport that is well, non-white. That shouldn't be a "take". That's fact, and how it goes. Many more layers to this deserve articulate and intelligent discourse well beyond this post. 

The identity politics are running wilddddd...

- Politicians utilizing Clark's name to push political narratives is so rich. What happened to "shut up and dribble"? Or, "keeping politics out of sports"! Again, there are sooooo many layers to this. Clark used the phrase "they awoke a monster" in regards to her motivation in not making Team USA. You know, typical athlete stuff. Mamba Mentality, if you will, not outrage and social injustice!

Look what they are doing to Caitlin!!!!!! 

But in reality, Clark awoke a monster in us. What athlete is next? And why are we like this?



- I understand the Olympic team discussion in regards to keeping the growth of the game going (I'm so sick of the phrase at this point) however, I'm asking a basketball-only question here - who are you taking off that Team USA roster? 

Is anyone lobbying for Arike Ogunbowale who also was snubbed and has a greater case to make the team (based on merit - ah yes!) than Clark? 

In continuing to use LeBron's career exposure in the fishbowl beginning in this new athlete-coverage (or whatever), I do have to wonder - what would the reaction be if say, LeBron was added to Team USA under the guidance of "continuing to grow the game" in his early career?

- Just talkin' hoops - has anyone discussed (or evaluated) many of the parts of her game she got away with in college, that need to be elevated or adjusted (and likely will)?

Oh by the way, can we talk hoops, regarding Caitlin Clark? Like, please! That would be more fun, to be honest. 

Recently Read

Would You Rather: Questions 121-130

This edition of "Would You Rather" is credited to the NBA Would You Rather NBA Account on Instagram ( See Here ). Adding to the fun, this edition (and possibly future ones) are all NBA basketball questions.  121. Who would you rather have on your favorite NBA team - Giannis Antetokounpo or James Harden?  Seeing how I'm a lifelong suffering Knicks fan, the thought of any of these guys in blue and orange is hard to believe. With that said, I'm taking the Greek Freak for this reason - I enjoy watching him play a bit more. Nothing against Harden who is amazing as well, but at times, the ball sticks and that isn't always fun. Plus, I feel like we haven't yet seen a finished Giannis. 122. Would you rather have Giannis Antetokounpo with no driving ability or James Harden with no Three-Point shooting ability?  This is definitely a weird and unique one, but I'll take Harden. Giannis without his strength doesn't offer much. However, if Harden's d...

Dome Pondering Movie Review: The Man from Toronto (2022)

What is it about?  After an average screw-up is mistaken for an assassin, they must work together to accomplish the mission at hand to break free from other restraints as well.  Who is in it? Kevin Hart - Teddy Jackson Woody Harrelson - The Man from Toronto Favorite Scene:  Teddy is on his first assignment from The Man from Toronto and is in a conference room, and must find out key information. What happens next is Teddy's goofiness shining through awkwardly.  Favorite Quote:   Teddy: [About his minute photos] What's that, for your little serial killer wall? The Man From Toronto: You think you'd make the wall? Come on, man. You're barely fridge material. Review:  This one lasted on the "My Watch" list for a few years. After finally getting to it, I wasn't disappointed.  Woody Harrelson is one of those actors for me who typically isn't in bad stuff, so this one got the benefit of the doubt. While I love Kevin Hart, the trailer alone felt very similar to...

Quick Ponder: In-Process Obituaries?

Are we just active,  in-process, obituaries  for an eventual interest read and remembrance from the curious? Can we be more?