Skip to main content

Syracuse "Self-Imposed Ban" is Disingenuous


Disingenuous is the only word that comes to mind whenever I think about the recent "Self-imposed ban" by the Syracuse University Athletics department. Even as a member and a professional employee of the NCAA umbrella, it's the kind of situation that bothers me so much about the NCAA, and some collegiate sports specifically, basketball and football. The schools which do very little to educate or prepare it's student-athletes on the merits of the program while cheating and breaking the rules of the governing body it is under. 

I'll try not to get on my soap box on this one, but let's be honest, there are a lot of schools out there who break the NCAA rules, not just Syracuse. I'm not naive. However, in respect to the many friends and family I have in the Central New York area who love SU Athletics - and they should - the University's conduct in these findings are gross, negligible, and outright disrespectful to their fans and community.
With that said, there are some quick thoughts I pulled away from this latest situation regarding Syracuse University: 

Boeheim is STILL Boeheim

Jim Boeheim is a good coach. Some critics need to relax on attempting to tarnish the coach's legacy with this recent development. Academic Affairs Departments relay eligibility of players to Athletics, and it is very possible that is where they may have been the mix-up. Athletics can only go on what they are told when it comes to grades, eligibility, and NCAA regulations. 

However, while I will always knock Boeheim for rarely graduating players and never really winning with meaning (his 950+ wins are vastly empty compared to say a Coach K or some other coaches with lesser career wins, just my opinion), trying to overtly pin this all on him is quite the slippery slope. Did he benefit from this? Sure. But let's settle down with the off-the-cliff claims until further information is revealed. 

Fan Responsibility

An average price of $80 for tickets to see the Syracuse Men's Basketball team in a building that is one of the most outdated in all sports in this nation, not to mention to sit on bleachers for your gaming comfort, is quite the sham the University pulls off. I'll say it over and over and over and over. And I will always feel for the Syracuse faithful, who, because of the unconditional and fevered support they show to the team and the University, are gouged for their dollar. And this is coming from a resident of New York City. I get supply and demand. But with no other viable competition, and for a market that is less timid and critical than other areas when it comes to their sporting critiques, the University can get away with it. 

Syracuse owes their fans, even more so following this ordeal. Especially the season-ticket holders who outright support the team. Coach Boeheim had some ridiculous excuse regarding the situation recently that simply exasperated the situation. And though defended him a few lines above, his reasoning was troubling to read. Telling your fan base that a home game versus Virginia Tech is worth more than the hope of being a part of a winning season is just crazy. 

However long this ban will be once the NCAA hammer comes down, The University owes the fans. Reduced tickets, lowered parking, a free Dome dog - SOMETHING, ANYTHING!

Right Time to Take the Hit

Yes, I'm on board in the belief Syracuse decided to take this ban because A) it may influence the NCAA to issue a softer blow, and B) They aren't having the best season. Were they completely out of it? No. However, what is the chance that this year's club would make a run for a NCAA title? 

I'm just at the belief that any program being investigated for what they are being accused of aren't above doing such a thing. And to be quite frank, the timing is indeed dubious. Middle of the season? C'mon! If  they played out the string and had taken the ban next year, that would have been impressive. 

Regardless, it's too suspicious for me. And as I stated above - soooooooo disingenuous. The Knicks should use that excuse..."self-ban from the playoffs". Yeah, that's it. 

and finally...

What About The Kids, Man? 

This is the thing that bothers me about this situation more than ever. Why do these current student-athletes have to take the hit for a University and program who can't follow the rules or keep their you-know-what together? 

For a guy like Rakeem Christmas, it's a shame he cannot continue to improve through the ACC tournament and hopefully one last appearance in March. It's not fair to him, to the rest of a group who were not around during these violations, and definitely for the University to punish this group to save their own behinds. 

I would like to see the NCAA add to the rule book the opportunity for student-athletes to transfer without penalty whenever programs come under violations or even "self-imposed" bans like this. All of Syracuse players should have the right to transfer following this season. That includes 2015-16 commits. 

I can't say it enough, this "self-imposed ban" is egregious and disingenuous in so many ways. It makes Syracuse look terrible, and quite honestly, they have no one to blame but themselves. 

For shame Syracuse University, for shame. 

Recently Read Posts

Impact Wrestling Emergence 2022 Review: "...Just Solid - So Freakin' Solid."

It probably won't come as a shock to anyone who follows this blog that I will say the following statement: Impact Wrestling may just be the most consistently entertaining and fresh - very important adjective here! - wrestling product that I've engaged with over the past two years. It's just always there, as solid as it can be. No real highs, or lows that push me away as a fan - just good, consistent, thorough, solid pro wrestling enjoyment.  Now, make no mistake about it, over the past summer, I found myself a whopping thirteen weeks behind this solid product in favor of the still new (and intriguing) AEW product and my on-again-off-again hope in the WWE due to nostalgia. However, trusty-work-from-home days have allowed me to binge watch (and work, of course) and it certainly opened my eyes to a new experience when it came to wrestling. Removal from the episodic style habit, and the feel of episodes bridging together seamlessly.  Also, remove from the internet culture of we

5 Thoughts on Pujols Hitting 700

It almost feels like the negative vitriol that surrounded Major League Baseball and its labor issues have dissipated into an air of forgetfulness and forgiveness. A season that has brought us old-school lore with the chasing of historical numbers by way of Aaron Judge and Albert Pujols, and the likes of a modern-day Babe Ruth, in another dominant season by Shohei Ohtani, would ultimately do that. Sprinkle in some amazing rookies on the rise, and all of sudden it's, what did I say about baseball's treatment of fans? It's been some season... In this post, I want to focus on Albert Pujols...the "King", the "Machine", one of the greatest ever. After hitting a historic 700th Home Run ( by the way, I definitely predicted that back in March  - just humble-bragging a bit), I wanted to drop five (fitting, yeah?) thoughts on Albert Pujols:  GREATEST EVER?! - Pujols' career often feels like the Angels' years were some sort of nightmare or a bad edition in a

Sunday Sundown Rundown - 9/25/22

3  Up 1. Albert Pujols - 700 homeruns is insane. Even through a generation of steroids, the number is incredibly exclusive (sans, you know, Bonds). So much props to Pujols who literally puts himself in some rarified discussions among the game's greatest.  Here are some quick thoughts from yours truly on Pujols hitting 700 .  2. PATHFINDER - The fight against cancer just got a smidge better. GRAIL announced results from their PATHFINDER study that may have found ways to provide early detection screening to significantly enhance the discovery of cancer well before symptoms begin.  I accidentally ran into this story - why isn't this more headline news? SMH.  3. Pandemic Over? - The World Health Organization (remember them, before everyone suddenly became public health experts) described COVID as an "acute global emergency". Going even further, announced that 20M global deaths were avoided last year due to vaccines. Just outright amazing.  3 Down 1. Brett Favre - No resp

Would You Rather: Questions 81-90

81. Would you rather be 4'5" or 7'7"? I would prefer to be 7'7". On this weird spectrum, I'm already used to being taller than the average person. I can deal with the extreme height. It'll be nice to play some pick up basketball.  82. Would you rather be tall and fat, or short and well built? Tall and fat. I can always lose the weight. Plus, short and jacked dudes often have to fight the stigma of being jerks on first appearance.  83. Would you rather be poor and work at a job you love, or rich and a job you hate? Poor and work at a job you love. Take it from someone who has their dream job, the sense of purpose and peace of mind is indeed worth much.