Skip to main content

Doing 'Cruiserweight' Right This Time


It's odd to use the term "cruiserweight" once again, but hey, the 90's are cool again, right? Or, maybe, just maybe, it's Vince McMahon's continual pursuit for complete and utter pro wrestling dominance? Yup, I'm sure we're both on the same page - the latter reasoning. 

Regardless, why not? After all, the WWE has this amazing Network (it really is fantastic) and it's historic library of pro wrestling's past, and quite frankly, how can they not want fresh content to added to it to drive viewers to use it for more than just the past. I'm a fan of the venture. 

But really, let's be quite frank, despite the slanted storytelling of the Monday Night Wars that is full of the victors rearranging the narrative, cruiserweights, and that style of pro wrestling has been a void that the WWE hasn't captured quite well - ever. 

Think about their attempt with the light heavyweight championship, and the dissolve of the Cruiserweight "brand" when they first acquired WCW. The WWE has never been able to create or produce the buzz and cult-like following such a style is capable of drawing. Despite the occasional exception every few years, as long as McMahon is running the E, the aura of the company is and always will be the land of the giants and the larger than life superstars. Those under 205 lbs and barely scratching six feet don't jive with that unwritten mission statement. 

But it doesn't take a genius to realize what the WWE is doing, and can possibly do with the WWE Network. They understand that pro wrestling does indeed have different styles, niches, and fanbases. They've sort of cornered some of that indy-like intrigue with NXT, and now, providing that same platform with their Cruiserweights with 205 Live.

The move also allows them to continue to be the avenue for the top and best talent outside of their kingdom within the industry. They now provide a platform for everything, thus I'm sure, making life incredibly difficult for TNA, ROH, and as we saw earlier this year, even, New Japan, in the scouting department. 

For me, this style of wrestling is a favorite. It appeals to me. I love the guys who can move, flip, pull of innovative things, and sometimes, present a match that just flat out looks like chaos and a car crash on my screen. 

WCW's version was my first intrigue with this. And with the talented roster they had, how could you not? Then of course, there was TNA and the X-Division, which in my opinion, is the very best this style has EVER been done. So many great names. So innovative. And at the time, they had the division smashing industry boundaries by being on par with the World title. And of course, New Japan also has been carrying the flag on this as well. 

I enjoyed parts of the Cruiserweight tournament over the summer, and have been coming around to this latest attempt of WWE to dive into the style. After watching the inaugural show of 205 Live, I had some really quick thought points: 

- The WWE production is absolutely fantastic. I'm not in love with the ropes, the belt, or the purple color scheme, but I like the idea of branding the style along with the continued introduction of wrestlers, which is a great start. It's much better than what TNA has fallen into in just placing random multiple-man matches out for audiences with no character development. 

- Having the show live after Smackdown already seems like a death knell for the product. It was obvious the crowd who remained were interested in that style, but I'll be surprised if you find that enthusiasm everywhere they tour, and on a weekly basis. 

- Corey Graves is the best color commentator in pro wrestling today in my opinion. Great to have him on the call. I would prefer Austin Aries in this division and not wearing a headset. 

- This is a concept that is going to take a while, considering the introduction of wrestlers to the fans, and keeping the style fresh on a show of it's own. What makes the style so much fun is in fact the contrast it plays on the card with other styles. The key, as aways, is creating programming that will make it unique. Storylines will be vital for this show. 

- TNA once again missed another opportunity (I know, chalk another one up on the board). The X-Division was ripe for a show of it's own, and much like many of their opportunities, they whiffed. It should be interesting to see how their division is branded moving forward when the style is no longer unique to their brand, and possibly, is being presented better (and more clearly) elsewhere. 

I should stress, and this is just purely my opinion (I know how fiery pro wrestling fans get), TNA has something special in Trevor Lee, and a pretty good crop of X-Division guys currently on the roster. 2017 really is shaping up to be interesting for TNA. 

- Kudos to the WWE for the character diversity in the division. One of the reasons WCW's presentation of this style worked so well was the eclectic group of guys that were in the division. Masked men. Technicians. Daredevils. Malenko. Mysterio. Guerrero. Jericho. Benoit. Psicosis. La Parka. Juventud. Kidman. Silver King! Okay, I'm getting carried away. 

But really, though. Typing out a few of those names. Damn, that was an impressive roster!

Still, they all made for a great clash of styles. And it seems the WWE did their homework and pulled the best of the best before making another attempt at this. 

- And finally, Rich Swann might just be the first breakthrough guy for the division. The entrance song, along with the charisma, and an average ability on the mic (still far above everyone except for Kendrick) adds up to a huge asset.

- And one more finally, on top of that "finally", how many microaggression statements were made in that match against the Bollywood Boys? Also, touching on mic skills, Gulak and Nese are great in the ring, but that post-match promo? Yikes! 

Anyway, with all of that said, I'm looking forward to more from the WWE and their latest foray into this style of pro wrestling. It's not perfect, but it has potential. Needless to say, I think they're doing it right this time. Or at the very least, the best they've ever done it. 

Recent Favorites

Quick Ponder: Daily Armor

Imagine, if we can see the dents and scratches, the smashes and chaos,  on the daily armor, each of us put on. Just imagine. 

2024 NBA All-Star Weekend Thoughts

There's something wrong with the All-Star Game.  Yeah, we've definitely had this conversation before. Expect to pick up this very discussion (again) in July when Major League Baseball has their version in the "Mid-Summer Classic" when it is the ONLY current topic to bounce around in the stratosphere of sports discourse.  What's wrong with the All-Star Game?!  I'm not dismissing the obvious - yes, the NBA All-Star Game is very much at an alarming point of necessary refinement and change - evaluation is needed. What we saw on Sunday night was not disappointing, but outright embarrassing. Also yes, gone are the days when the game flooded your television screen at a respectable 6:30pm on NBC, and you were wowed by the athleticism and star power of the first half of the game, and treated to what felt like the world's best players playing pickup basketball on the grandest stage.  Now? Not so much. So yeah, we got the message. The outrage - and shock TV and hot t

Dome Pondering Movie Review: Hustle (2022)

What is it about? A long-time scout, Stanley Sugarman, grinds out the life of an NBA scout and the politics of the NBA by taking a chance on a prospect he believes in to change both of their lives.  Who is in it? Adam Sandler - Stanley Sugarman Juancho Hernangomez - Bo Cruz Queen Latifah - Teresa Sugarman Favorite Scene:   Kermit and Bo line up at center court and Kermit begins the trash talk to get inside of Bo's head, eventually taking him off his game.  Favorite Quote:   "I'll say one last inspirational thing to you: they can't kill you if you're already dead." Review:  Hustle sat on "My List" on my Netflix account for quite a long time. Parked on the couch in the middle of the night with a newborn, and jonesing for some hoops, I dove in on what I read (and heard from others) was a "really good film". I'll give away the suspense, I thought Hustle was decent. It felt too cliche and had little depth, but still, a really good film.  The