Skip to main content

Thoughts and Takeaways From First Democratic Presidential Debate


Well, after watching the red guys (and girl) duke it out in what seems like an all out battle royal for the Republican candidacy, it was time to see what was cooking on those coming from the left. The timing was right, especially when the GOP grabbed so much attention via the lightning rod that is Donald Trump. 

I felt this first debate for the Dems was indeed vital in introducing America and many new voters to the candidates NOT named Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders. Most importantly, after the excitement to vote drummed up by President Obama in his last two elections, the Dems needed to find a way to connect with those same voters who believed in Obama, and who may want to believe in one of these candidates as well.

Quite frankly, this race is for the White House is WIDE open.

Unfortunately, in my opinion, what we ended up getting was an utter disaster. Honestly, this was not a good showing for the Dems as a party, and for a few candidates. The debate as whole, from a pure informative and competitive debate stance was not a good one at all. 

With that said, here are some thoughts and takeaways from the first Dem debate: 

- I gave props to CNN and Jake Tapper in the second Republican Debate, and I must do the same right from the start for Anderson Cooper. Cooper was poignant, aggressive, and very authoritative in making sure candidates answered questions and didn't shy away from them. Cooper was fantastic, and honestly, was probably the biggest winner of this debate. Sad, I know.

- On the other hand, why was Don Lemon a part of this? I'm not a fan of these networks attempting to squeeze their anchors onto these debates for sheer face time. It doesn't always work, and in the case of Lemon, he very well felt like that forced piece into the puzzle. 

- I was a fan of the stated rules which allowed one minute responses and 30 second rebuttals if awarded. There was still the usual over-speaking and ignoring of said rules, but again, kudos to Cooper on keeping the discussion within the debate framework. The Republican Debates very well could have used these guidelines. 

Speaking of, wouldn't the better play be to only give the candidates a live mic when they are asked to speak, and then cut the mic when their time is up? How many candidates would then be forced to give quality answers, and not ramble on or offer stock or previously prepared answers? 

- I also like the allowance of the two minute opening statements for each candidate. Unfortunately, I wasn't in love with many of them, sans O'Malley and Sanders who were enticing. 

- Speaking of O'Malley, in my opinion, he was the winner of the night. Not by an overwhelming margin, or because he out-debated the others, but because he probably gained the most from the night. He was clear, concise, and probably opened the eyes of a few voters. 

- O'Malley's biggest strength of the night was in fact the use of pathos in most of his arguments, which were well timed and well executed. From his story on Baltimore, to acknowledging the parents of an Aurora, CO victim who were in attendance, O'Malley gained some major points with well timed emotional arguments. 

- Sanders I thought spoke well all night. He has a certain unorthodox charm to his approach that is unlike the typical political cookie-cutter approach we usually see. 

- Clinton, of course, is the most charismatic and well spoken candidate of the bunch. However, much like the Republican Debate, she was the center of controversy from her flip flop answer on the question regarding her flip flopping (which I thought was hilarious), to her e-mail situation being investigated by the Feds. In some ways, she has become the Dems Donald Trump. 

- Speaking of, you just had to love how the entire panel attempted to cover for her e-mail fiasco. It felt like they wanted to attack it, yet not dwell on it too much for the sake of the party, the whole thing just making for an awkward discussion. 

 - Also, on a personal note, I find it weird when Clinton plays up potentially being the first woman President. It's a good idea for a debate and for a campaign, especially with women's issues being a main topic of discussion, but it comes across poor when another woman (Carly Fiorina) on the Republican side rarely brings up her gender. Again, just me. 

- Lincoln Chafee had the WORST answer (and really, of all three debates thus far)! When asked about voting for a bill he did not know about, he stated, "Glass-Steagall was my very first vote. I'd just arrived, my dad had died in office..." After Cooper pressed by wondering if he voted for a bill he didn't know about, Chafee continued to kill his campaign by crying saying, "I think you're being a little rough." 

I think Chafee just killed his campaign with that one. 

-  Speaking of rough answers, how bad was Jim Webb's responses to all social concerns? Listening to him squirm his way through those matters were the only thing worst than his constant complaining of not having enough time to speak. 

All in all, this Democratic debate was not a good one. It didn't hurt Clinton and Sanders, O'Malley gained some steam from some key moments, but Webb and (especially!) Chafee buried themselves as real candidates to threaten the front runners. 

Much of the credibility from all five have been chipped away after and during this one, which really hurt a lot of the content each of them attempted to bring to the table.

Joe Biden, get in there, will you? 

I'm hoping for a better debate in November on CBS. Much better. 

Recently Read Posts

Impact No Surrender 2023 Review: "Interested in where the Product is Going"

I've fallen behind on my Impact Wrestling viewing, but honestly, that's okay. For viewership and enjoyment, yes. Not so well for posting a review for readership long after it's noteworthy or relevant. But whatevs, that's just where I am in life. Wrestling is much more fun removed from the restraints and influence of the criticism and impact (no pun intended) of the current time. That's just me. You can probably thank social media. Moving on, No Surrender 2023 continues Impact's progress into the new year. The product is still solid and consistent with a nice blend of characters and wrestlers moving in and out of the main event scene, along with a fresh batch of a resurgence of characters and occurrences. Nothing says that more than Rich Swann vs. Josh Alexander.  No Surrender was a solid event, but it does leave me extremely interested in where the product is going, or should I say planning, for 2023. I don't want to say that Alexander's title reign has

Sunday Sundown Rundown - 2/19/23

3 Up 1. India's Tap Water Access - This is a rather remarkable story. It's a story that offers humility wrapped in the extraordinary. India's Jal Jeevan Mission provided almost 79 million - 79 MILLION! - households with tap water. Just tap water!  2. Jordan Make-A-Wish Record - MJ is often loved through nostalgia, narrative, and remembrance for being politically neutral - even in giving. MJ these days has made some influential contributions, including this latest $10M donation to the Make-A-Wish foundation.  3. WWE Elimination Chamber - A tremendously entertaining pay-per-view on the road to Wrestlemania. The best storyline in pro wrestling continues to evolve between Sami Zayn and the Bloodline.  3A. City of Montreal - Give it up to the city of Montreal for what made a few nights of pro wrestling an awesome experience. Can we get this city more events?  3 Down 1. Michigan State Shooting - We're broken. Very broken. My thoughts and prayers are with those friends and fam

A Product of Us: Thoughts on Durant Trade

I said back in July when Kevin Durant rocked the NBA world with his trade request, that he "showed us who he was".  It wasn't a negative comment, but one that encompasses his entire career being a product of our current sport climate - success and focus on legacy. We emphasize the value of a career on rings, and thus, Durant has too. Why wouldn't he?!  Upon waking up and realizing that Durant will don the purple and orange for the Phoenix Suns in what is clearly now a team to watch come the NBA Playoffs, I find myself further pondering if Kevin Durant is the prime result of what we - yes, us! - have done to the modern athlete.  Today, Durant is one of the greatest basketball players I've ever seen. EVER. The dude is rare. He's a seven-foot magician which makes defending him even more difficult based on how damn efficient he is on the basketball court. It's downright poetic and beautiful to watch Durant play. And yes, I'm romanticizing his game. I belie

Sunday Sundown Rundown - 1/8/22

3 Up 1. New Year - Happy New Year to you all! I've written it in a bunch of emails, mainly to be courteous, but I really do wish you the best for you. I hope 2023 is a great one for all of you DP readers.  2. Buffalo Athletic Trainers - Let's give it up for the Athletic Trainers of the Buffalo Bills who performed with courage, steadfastness, and urgency in regard to Damar Hamlin. We should be celebrating those trainers more.  2A. Athletic Trainers - And because I'm always around them, let's give it up for Athletic Trainers in general. They do so much and very much go unnoticed in the space of sports, athletics, and performance.  2B. Damar Hamlin - Praying for Hamlin and his family... 3. Broadway Bounceback - We all like to believe we're back from COVID, but we're not. But it's news like Broadway having its biggest week of sales since the pandemic began is some nice news. Everyone in the theatre industry deserves it.  3 Down 1. Damar Hamlin Situation - Horri