Skip to main content

Thoughts on the 2017 Baseball Hall of Fame Ballot


Another year, another Hall of Fame class decided, and as always, there are all sorts of eyebrow raising shenanigans going on with it. Of course, this is all my point of view, the way everyone else has an opinion and viewpoint whenever these results are revealed in January. 

First, let me say congrats to Jeff Bagwell, Tim Raines, and Ivan Rodriguez. All of them are tremendous players, none carries any doubt of their legitimacy for the Hall of Fame. Just tremendous ball players who deserve the day they have coming to them in Cooperstown in July. I'm actually super stoked for Raines, who was such a complete player.

But of course, this year's results have all sorts of head scratchers, most notably, surrounding the always-popular-steroid discussion. I'll air my grievances as such: 

- We need to come to a consensus on the feeling of PED use/suspicion. Jeff Bagwell, who had "whispers" around him using PEDs, similar to that of Mike Piazza, got in, yet, Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens remain on this pseudo-punishment-waiting-list? I'm not sure the message being sent here. 

- And as always, my belief is that it isn't a Hall of Fame if Bonds ain't in it. I know that's not popular among fans, but Barry Bonds is the greatest player of my lifetime. The dude was insane. 

- Speaking of PED's, how in the world of worlds (of all of the worlds), does Manny Ramirez muster  a vote of 23.8%? WHAT?! Ramirez was busted twice - TWICE - for PED use, and we're talking AFTER it was frowned upon to be juicing. So baffling. 

- Ditto the same type of sentiment for those who punched tabs for Jason Varitek and Edgar Renteria. But, some of these writers will tell you about the integrity of their vote and how they take their selection seriously. 

If my logic adds up, it doesn't matter if you have whispers of PED usage, or that you in fact failed multiple PED tests, you just can't be well...I have no idea. Apparently you just can't be Barry Bonds or Roger Clemens. And if you are, that just sucks for you. 

- On a brighter note, it seems Trevor Hoffman will get his call next year. As evident from this blog, I'm partial to my relief brethrens, and Hoffman deserves it. It's a shame that Lee Smith couldn't get the same amount of support to get in.

As you can imagine, I can't wait for Mariano Rivera to go in. I'll have to make the trip to Cooperstown for that. And yes, I also can't wait to see the writers (now that ballots are available to the public) who decided he wasn't worthy of their selection. You know it will happen. Because Babe Ruth didn't get...yada yada yada. 

- The whole "DHs don't deserve to be in the Hall of Fame" narrative is so tired. The hypocrisy is so strong when guys get in the Hall of Fame based on their defensive ability, yet, somehow, there is this backlash over one of the best right handed hitters not getting in because he filled a legal position created by baseball. Add another "unwritten rule of baseball" that is ridiculous. 

- I hope Moose gets in someday. He is one of my favorite pitchers of all-time. Really, really enjoyed Mussina on the bump. 

- Speaking of favorites, Gary Sheffield is a tremendously underrated player. Check the numbers. And take a look at his versatility as a player.

- Vlad Guerrero was robbed. He's first ballot material. I'll leave it at that. 

- And finally, I absolutely love how passionate baseball fans are when it comes to the Hall of Fame. It carries so much honor and prestige, especially in comparison to the other sports. Despite all of the opinions, arguments, emotions, and cynicism that comes with the election process, people care, and for the game of baseball, that's very, very cool. 

Looking forward to future Hall of Fame debates to come. 

Recently Read

Would You Rather: Questions 121-130

This edition of "Would You Rather" is credited to the NBA Would You Rather NBA Account on Instagram ( See Here ). Adding to the fun, this edition (and possibly future ones) are all NBA basketball questions.  121. Who would you rather have on your favorite NBA team - Giannis Antetokounpo or James Harden?  Seeing how I'm a lifelong suffering Knicks fan, the thought of any of these guys in blue and orange is hard to believe. With that said, I'm taking the Greek Freak for this reason - I enjoy watching him play a bit more. Nothing against Harden who is amazing as well, but at times, the ball sticks and that isn't always fun. Plus, I feel like we haven't yet seen a finished Giannis. 122. Would you rather have Giannis Antetokounpo with no driving ability or James Harden with no Three-Point shooting ability?  This is definitely a weird and unique one, but I'll take Harden. Giannis without his strength doesn't offer much. However, if Harden's d...

Dome Pondering Movie Review: In a Relationship (2018)

What is it about?  Following the progression of two couples over the course of a summer.  Who is in it? Emma Roberts - Hallie Michael Ambrano - Owen Dree Hemingway - Willa Patrick Gibson - Matt Favorite Scene:  [Spoiler Alert] Matt and Villa sit on the stairs, and he admits to not wanting to introduce Willa to his parents.  Favorite Quote:  I don't... I don't think you ever find someone... you don't resent. And that's part of it. It's just... find the person you *want* to resent, you know. Review:  This was a weird film. The opener had much promise, but as the film continued, it felt like it was just getting longer.  My biggest gripe with the film is that I liked each of the characters less as I got to know them. I understand that the film attempted to highlight the modern relationship for a specific generation, and in certain ways, it succeeded in doing so. However, the characters never grew or became better people from their relationships...they just...

Thoughts on TNA on AMC Debut: "Yup, TNA is back. It is so back."

TNA is back.  And I know that because it is heavily under scrutiny by the internet. But that criticism comes with being back on a major platform like the AMC Network, and of course, taking the next step after a super successful 2025.  So, what did I think?  The show was...ummmm okay, at best. Some of the challenges the company faced heading into this weekend were well documented among the rumor mill, which didn't bode well for the company. In balancing reported visa issues with talent, pivoting after losing core talent to free agency, and attempting to build and manage talent workload with a premium live event on Saturday, TNA found themselves in the usual TNA stuff. The most peculiar - and strangest - of situations to be in going into a big network premiere. This company, man! All in all, again, the show was okay. It had its flaws. It had some cool moments. It didn't live up to the hype (or the expectations we each had for such a premiere). But it's one show. TNA has put...