Skip to main content

NCAA Finally Deserves Some Credit


Let's hear a round of applause for the NCAA. No, that's not a sarcastic statement at all. The NCAA really does deserve a pat on the back for it's recent actions regarding the overall amateur legitimacy of the student-athlete. 

With Johnny Manziel in the public eye and under investigation for receiving funds for autographed items, the debate heated up once again over naming rights and trademarks in collegiate athletics. Obviously, this stems from the already pending lawsuit of Charles O'Bannon and company fighting the NCAA over the association's use of player's names and likenesses. And of course, we've seen the NCAA slowly backtrack by not licensing video games, even the widely popular NCAA Football series by EA Sports.

Even as a college athletics professional - therefore being under the guidelines and umbrella of the NCAA - I've always found the NCAA's actions in regards to these issues very hypocritical. No, I do not believe college athletes should be paid (and that's for another post, for another time), but I do agree that the injustice is pretty gross when it comes to the money made from these kids' images, reputations, and trademarks. 

The video game example was easy enough to prove as the characters resembled their real life counterparts. However, Jay Bilas, God bless his heart for the courage he showed on his crusade via Twitter, proved the NCAA's hypocritical nature simply through the NCAA shop on www.shopncaasports.com. 





By searching a player's name, jerseys, t-shirts, and other "likenesses" popped up prompting or assisting consumers in sales. Johnny Manziel, regardless of whatever you think about the kid's character, can't make money off of his own name, but the NCAA can? 

Hypocritical much? 

Since Bilas' epic crusade proving the NCAA's deceitful ways, the NCAA removed the search function from their online shop, and also agreed to cease sales of school jerseys.  

There is no doubt the NCAA makes millions billions of dollars off of athletes who never see a dime from it. And its true than DI athletics in this nation have risen in such popularity and business, that it is now an existing contradiction in it's attempt to keep amateurism at the core of the student-athlete. Really, its laughable. 

Yet, with it's feet to the fire, the NCAA is beginning to make changes. Something as little as the removal of jerseys on the website is a small battle won for those who would like to see a fair landscape. Or at least one much less reflecting of taking advantage of young men and women.

It would be easy to claim the NCAA tucked it's tail between it's legs, and gave in to the public pressure that has been building, especially with O'Bannon's lawsuit pending. However, and this might sound weird, but the NCAA deserves credit for it's change.

The culture seems to be changing in the NCAA after its President, Mark Emmert called the sales of jerseys and the likeness search engine, "a mistake". Then later referenced what while the NCAA will no longer be selling the jerseys, it will leave the sales to the schools. 

Soooooooo, the NCAA won't be selling jerseys, buuuuuuuuutttt, it's members will still be able to?

Ahhhh...umm, alright?

After years of holding steady amid those who oppose the money-making juggernaut's ways, it seems the NCAA is finally at a crossroads. Many of the 348 members of the Division I sector of the NCAA agree that the organization needs to improve. 

It definitely does.

Until then, give the NCAA credit. Yes, that's right, give them credit. 

For the time being, they're no longer pretending to be in support of amateurism. 

For the first time, the NCAA culture is owning up to the hypocrisy in Division I athletics. 

Bravo. Applauds are in order. 

Recent Favorites

Yankees 2024 World Series - Ponderings and Stuff

I thought I would try something different for the 2024 World Series, especially since my Yankees are in it, and offer some quick ponderings and share some stuff from my thought process. Why not?  I expect a tough and arduous series. In many ways in approaching it, I would be shocked if this goes five or fewer games to either side. Obviously, I wouldn't mind if it happened for the Yankees.  Whoever wins, maybe they should also get claim to the 2017 World Series title. I'm kidding. Sort of... Game 1 Dodgers d. Yankees, 6-3  (LAD Leads Series 1-0) This is one of those games where I love baseball, but I hate it. That was a tremendous game if I didn't have a rooting interest. However, I do. And baseball, by nature, has a flair for creating moments that can rip your heart out as a fan. This one did. It's up there, to be honest. In this time, it feels worse than Sandy Alomar's home run off of Mo in 1997. But likely to not leave me in my feelings like the 2001 World Series

Knicks Trade is Great - However, Julius Got Us Here

I purposely took some time before posting on this recent trade. It came out of absolutely nowhere and left me in shock on that fateful Saturday night - even though, every Knick fan knew a Julius Randle trade was inevitable. Karl-Anthony Towns is an amazing talent. He’s All-NBA. He’s an All-Star. And in many ways, he’s a very, very, very unique and select talent. Also yes, he has flaws. Who doesn't in today's debate-anything landscape?  For pure basketball reasons, Towns as a Knick makes sense. The spacing is better. The options are better. The style of play is better defined. And the opportunity for the ultimate, an NBA championship, is increased. However, this trade gets all the feels when we focus on Julius Randle. If you follow this little slice of the internet, you probably have gathered that I’ve been a loyal Randle supporter since arriving in 2010. His potential was there. Yes, he’s been frustrating. There were moments of high-level frustration. But Randle has been our gu

It's Time. Pete Rose Belongs in the Hall of Fame

It sounds mean, but Pete Rose served his lifetime ban. After the recent passing of the all-time hits leader, the court of public opinion is now in session on one of the sport's biggest questions and most debated topics - should Pete Rose be in the Hall of Fame? We all know the stances and varied degrees of opinion on this by now. Rose committed the biggest and most unforgivable crime in the game (and in all sports) - gambling not just on the game, but on your own team. That’s sanctimonious to the integrity of everything that is MLB.  And there is the other side - watching baseball evolve into a product that pushes gambling on billboards, commercials, and a staple of the fan experience, yet, retrospectively keeping one of the sport's most salient record holders guilty for the same thing that is now exercised heavily. The Hall of Fame of Fame standards have been criticized as we deal with the aftermath of the steroid era and the other major elephant on the field - Barry Bonds bei