Skip to main content

Wrapping My Mind Around The Absurdity That is Baseball's New $300M Man


I'm still attempting to wrap my mind around $325M. After all, these mega deals always seem to offer great sticker shock whenever they are announced. $100M seemed like such a huge deal when the Dodgers gave Kevin Brown that type of money way back when. Then of course, A-Rod, ah yes, our favorite guy over in this little part of the internet here, received well over $225M from Texas, and then the Yankees decided to top the stupidity absurdity of that deal with $275M. And now, we have the $300M man, Giancarlo Stanton.

No matter how many times I read the workings of this new contract, I can't help but shake my head in disbelief. What in the world are the Marlins thinking?! How in the world will this affect baseball going forward? 

By the way, didn't the Angels get a huge bargain for Mike Trout at six years, $144.5M?!

$325M for over 13 years. Again, my goodness! And if that wasn't crazy, the Marlins are giving Stanton a full no trade clause as well as an opt-out clause after six years which is absolutely awesome timing as Stanton would be turning 30 by then. Depending on his career trajectory, Stanton could possibly opt out and make even more money. Imagine that? 
Yet, regardless, $325M, 13 years, no trade clause, an opt out - that's a deal I wouldn't even agree to in a video game with fictional money. 

Compounding this disbelief is that this is the Miami Marlins. Yes, those Miami Marlins who never keep anyone. Those Marlins who constantly trade top talent for new prospects. Those Marlins, despite two World Series championships in a relatively short existence, who are known more for their penny pinching than anything else.

But you know what, $325M definitely will!

And then of course, there is the obvious - the dreaded A-Rod comparison. However, while the Yankees with A-Rod, and to an extent the Angels with Albert Pujols and Tigers with Miguel Cabrera, have signed their superstar on the wrong side of 30, this one actually locks up a franchise player through his prime years. Not a bad move. Actually, a move we are seeing all around baseball with the likes of Trout, McCutchen, Kershaw, Posey, and others signing deals before they hit the market. 

When looked at from that perspective, this might actually end up working out for the Marlins. Especially as they finally have a great core of young talent, a new ball park (despite that atrocity of an object they call art in center field), and now a certified and bona-fide star in Stanton who won't be leaving Miami in the near future. 

Yet, as all long term contracts come do, this one, the largest ever in MLB history, will come down to the health, longevity, and continued performance of Stanton. In today's sports world, seven years is considered risky and rolling the dice for an organization. Ten years is accepting the back end of the contract will absolutely suck. I can only imagine what thirteen years is like. That's twice the years of simply being risky!

Regardless, this is where we are at in baseball. $100M contracts are cliche. $300M contracts are the newest and sexiest girl in the room. Despite the "prime years" angle, and the idea of locking up your face for the next thirteen years, there is just that overwhelming commitment that scares me. For the Marlins, having to go through the nightmare of a 13 year contract, and for one of my favorite players in the game, Stanton, for giving his best years to a franchise that isn't the most credible when it comes to support and it's commitment to winning. 

But again, we're talking $325M for 13 years with a no-trade clause and an opt-out in six years. 

Every time I type it, it's just as absurd. 

And as we've learned in the past, there is always one team willing to do the absurd deal to take the business of the game to a whole new level. 

$325M. My goodness. 

Recently Read Posts

Impact Wrestling Emergence 2022 Review: "...Just Solid - So Freakin' Solid."

It probably won't come as a shock to anyone who follows this blog that I will say the following statement: Impact Wrestling may just be the most consistently entertaining and fresh - very important adjective here! - wrestling product that I've engaged with over the past two years. It's just always there, as solid as it can be. No real highs, or lows that push me away as a fan - just good, consistent, thorough, solid pro wrestling enjoyment.  Now, make no mistake about it, over the past summer, I found myself a whopping thirteen weeks behind this solid product in favor of the still new (and intriguing) AEW product and my on-again-off-again hope in the WWE due to nostalgia. However, trusty-work-from-home days have allowed me to binge watch (and work, of course) and it certainly opened my eyes to a new experience when it came to wrestling. Removal from the episodic style habit, and the feel of episodes bridging together seamlessly.  Also, remove from the internet culture of we

5 Thoughts on Pujols Hitting 700

It almost feels like the negative vitriol that surrounded Major League Baseball and its labor issues have dissipated into an air of forgetfulness and forgiveness. A season that has brought us old-school lore with the chasing of historical numbers by way of Aaron Judge and Albert Pujols, and the likes of a modern-day Babe Ruth, in another dominant season by Shohei Ohtani, would ultimately do that. Sprinkle in some amazing rookies on the rise, and all of sudden it's, what did I say about baseball's treatment of fans? It's been some season... In this post, I want to focus on Albert Pujols...the "King", the "Machine", one of the greatest ever. After hitting a historic 700th Home Run ( by the way, I definitely predicted that back in March  - just humble-bragging a bit), I wanted to drop five (fitting, yeah?) thoughts on Albert Pujols:  GREATEST EVER?! - Pujols' career often feels like the Angels' years were some sort of nightmare or a bad edition in a

Sunday Sundown Rundown - 9/25/22

3  Up 1. Albert Pujols - 700 homeruns is insane. Even through a generation of steroids, the number is incredibly exclusive (sans, you know, Bonds). So much props to Pujols who literally puts himself in some rarified discussions among the game's greatest.  Here are some quick thoughts from yours truly on Pujols hitting 700 .  2. PATHFINDER - The fight against cancer just got a smidge better. GRAIL announced results from their PATHFINDER study that may have found ways to provide early detection screening to significantly enhance the discovery of cancer well before symptoms begin.  I accidentally ran into this story - why isn't this more headline news? SMH.  3. Pandemic Over? - The World Health Organization (remember them, before everyone suddenly became public health experts) described COVID as an "acute global emergency". Going even further, announced that 20M global deaths were avoided last year due to vaccines. Just outright amazing.  3 Down 1. Brett Favre - No resp

Would You Rather: Questions 81-90

81. Would you rather be 4'5" or 7'7"? I would prefer to be 7'7". On this weird spectrum, I'm already used to being taller than the average person. I can deal with the extreme height. It'll be nice to play some pick up basketball.  82. Would you rather be tall and fat, or short and well built? Tall and fat. I can always lose the weight. Plus, short and jacked dudes often have to fight the stigma of being jerks on first appearance.  83. Would you rather be poor and work at a job you love, or rich and a job you hate? Poor and work at a job you love. Take it from someone who has their dream job, the sense of purpose and peace of mind is indeed worth much.