Skip to main content

DP Review of First Presidential 2012 Debate

The first leg of the presidential debates came and went, and honestly, it left me wanting more from both candidates. As a former College debater, a lover of the art form, and a total geek for political debates, last tonight's debates left me completely underwhelmed and disappointed. 

From the ridiculously phrased questions (You have two minutes to explain why you are different? How does that force debate, or facts?), the poor moderation of the panel, the insanely lack of respect for the code of a timed debate, and the overall poor structure, this debate was a complete and utter disaster. 

With such a poor structure, we received poorly structured arguments, tons of fluff because of the lack of the time limit, and constant pitter-patter that made both candidates look like children instead of the intelligent officials that they are. 

However, the first debate wasn't a total waste, as there were several things we can take away from the first debate.

1. Romney Can Hold His Own - It's well documented about Romney's struggles connecting with the American people leading up to this debate (Romney Lacks Connection With Nation). He has even done damage to himself. However, tonight he managed to let the facts fly, and he did a great job in presenting all of them in an offensive manner. His attack on "Obamacare" and the attack at the President for putting the bill before jobs was a great line and a great move. There was a certain passion exuding from Romney that I haven't seen yet.

2. President Obama Wheels Are Spinning - Besides the fact I kept getting annoyed at Obama for breaking every rule taught on debating and your stance at the podium (much of it imbedded from my Debate coach in college) as he rocked, leaned, and constantly looked over to at his coach, the President was really flat. That's only way to put it. He just seemed off of his game and lacked any substance or punch in any of his arguments. 

Did anyone else notice he barely looked at Romney, whereas Romney seemed to have embraced the challenge head-on by looking him head on while delivering answers?

Body language and posture sometimes say more than words in a debate. 

Where was the classic, charismatic, fiery, energetic guy we all know?

That guy didn't show up, and it was evident as Obama circled on the same arguments of what he was looking to do, rambled on with unfocused answers, and never truly made arguments that placed Romney on the ropes. 

3. Romney Still Struggles Vocabulary - The whole night Romney made blunders that simply would turn on-the-fence voters against him. Constantly, while watching the debate, the tag-team partner and I would look at each other and say, "did he really just say that?" 

The constant use of "my state" instead of Massachusetts. The use of "they" and "them" when referring to the middle class instead of "us" as a nation. The use of the word "poor" several times when discussing lower-income children. He even caught himself once on this one, and tried to correct it.

It's not worth not voting for him, however, if Romney wants to shake loose the reputation of being disconnected and actually caring for the middle and lower class, he needs to use words that won't alienate these demographics. 

4. Obama Missed Opportunities - This sort of rides of off Obama's flat performance, but the President also missed opportunities to really hit Romney with questions that the nation are clearly waiting for. We all know Romney/Ryan have made claims to what they are going to do, but have yet to actually explain it. President Obama did a good job of mentioning that his economic plan to cut the deficit was on the government website, but instead of shifitng the argument over to really lay Romney out to dry on national TV, President Obama continued to push his plan. 

And hello, how about the "47%" comment? That's a gold mine weapon that Obama could have used, and still can in the upcoming debates. Let's hope he doesn't forget it. 

Recent Favorites

Dome Pondering Movie Review: Tower Heist (2011)

What is it about?  Building employees, who are victims of a wealthy tenant's Ponzi scheme, conspire and work together to rob what is left of the man's fortune to not only put him in jail, but to get revenge.  Who is in it?  Ben Stiller - Josh Kovaks Eddie Murphy - Slide Casey Affleck - Charlie Matthew Broderick - Mr. Fitzhugh

Quick Ponder: Daily Armor

Imagine, if we can see the dents and scratches, the smashes and chaos,  on the daily armor, each of us put on. Just imagine. 

Dome Pondering Movie Review: Hustle (2022)

What is it about? A long-time scout, Stanley Sugarman, grinds out the life of an NBA scout and the politics of the NBA by taking a chance on a prospect he believes in to change both of their lives.  Who is in it? Adam Sandler - Stanley Sugarman Juancho Hernangomez - Bo Cruz Queen Latifah - Teresa Sugarman Favorite Scene:   Kermit and Bo line up at center court and Kermit begins the trash talk to get inside of Bo's head, eventually taking him off his game.  Favorite Quote:   "I'll say one last inspirational thing to you: they can't kill you if you're already dead." Review:  Hustle sat on "My List" on my Netflix account for quite a long time. Parked on the couch in the middle of the night with a newborn, and jonesing for some hoops, I dove in on what I read (and heard from others) was a "really good film". I'll give away the suspense, I thought Hustle was decent. It felt too cliche and had little depth, but still, a really good film.  The