Skip to main content

Hall of Fame Votes: The First Step in Handling the Steroid Era


The continued discussion of steroids, baseball, and how we should treat those from this era who are eligible for the Hall of Fame has been one that has bothered me for some time. So naturally, with one more day to go until we find out the first sample size of so many to come regarding these controversial sluggers, I wanted to address the situation before we find out whose face will become a plaque this summer. If any at all. 

My biggest gripe in the Hall of Fame voting is when voters, and fans as well, take it upon themselves to to pick and choose who should be let in based upon unbalanced criteria, and who should be banished forever into the "Hall of Really Great Players Who Unfortunately Used Steroids". We hear it all of the time. This guy should go in. This guy shouldn't. This guy was clean for sure. This guy was definitely on steroids - I just know it! Or, this guy would have made it without PEDs!

And that is where the biggest misconception of it all comes into play. Now I am not saying this is a clear and cut situation, because it isn't. This is as complex as they come in sports. However, I really believe we don't do the situation any justice when we treat it unfairly based upon our likes and dislikes for a particular athlete.

For instance, take Barry Bonds. Personally, Bonds is the greatest player I've ever seen in my life. Ever. And because we are so conditioned in the previous thinking, I'm sure many of you are stating, well, "of course, when you take steroids!" 

Yet, while Bonds is continuously vilified, we offer the forgiven hand to guys like Andy Pettitte, who is likable. Manny Ramirez received this treatment until he idiotically decided to get busted twice under the league's current drug testing program. The only person to do so. 

My point being we can't massage the story, the situation, the numbers, and the overall handle of each player's career to fit what public perception believes. As documents such as "The Mitchell Report" and the many unnamed players on the original 103 that tested positive in MLB's first big sting revealed, we have no idea. No idea who was using. No idea who wasn't. 

I often bring up the name Ken Griffey Jr, and other baseball fans immediately say, "no way Griff was on roids!" But then again, who knew that Rafael Palmeiro was? If you go by the simple injury results of PED usage, Griffey's career is a suspect of such usage. I'm not saying he did, but it does lend to the idea that we just don't know. 

And of course my favorite, the usage of asterisks, and the unfair accusation that the steroid era has ruined baseball. 

If you do your history homework on the beautiful game, you would know that baseball is all about different eras, and the sheer difference in each of them do not make the grand history and the compilation of all of it's numbers uniform. In the age of Bill James sheep and sabermatricians, that furthers the disdain many have against this era. 

Should we place an asterisk on all of Babe Ruth's players since he never once saw a pitch from any player of color, or any player from around the world? *Only played versus white players. That would be silly, right?

Should a career-known DH such as Edgar Martinez have an asterisk since he rarely played the field? 

Or how about the differences in stadiums and equipment? *Played in smaller ballparks. *Was able to use catcher mask. Or, *All home runs hit with ash bat.
 
History is written to reflect that time. We all will look back in the history books and know that Sammy Sosa's three consecutive 60-plus home run seasons were a sign of the times. Whether they were positive or negative. 

After all, don't we admire Babe Ruth's accomplishments despite the awful period in American history it came in. One could make the argument that those home runs were a reflection of the egregiousness taking place in our nation, and throughout sport. 

And through it all, we forget that Major League Baseball - the very governing institution - did not have any acting prohibitions on performance enhancing drugs. Not making a case for green lighting the actions or deeming the past steroid use acceptable, however, let's be honest with ourselves, its very hypocritical to come down on players for doing something MLB didn't care enough to prohibit themselves. 

Isn't the Hall of Fame for those that impacted the game in a tremendous way? 

I doubt you sat around screaming bloody murder as Sammy Sosa and Mark McGwire jacked homer after homer reviving a game in desperate need of resuscitation following a crucial labor stoppage.

Admit it - These two had a big impact on today's MLB success

So with Hall of Fame voting time upon us, there are many writers who are carrying ALL of these mis-truths and biased ways of thinking. And yes, many self-righteous fans are as well. Not to mention, some who simply enjoy wielding the power to determine an athlete's career fate. On the other hand, to the credit of others, they understand the concepts of getting through this reasonably, and most importantly, in a manner of getting it right - well, as right as you possibly can get it. 

With all of this said, if had a vote, I would  totally and completely eliminate an athlete under one condition - was he proven under MLB governance to have used performance enhancing drugs. This completely eliminates Manny Ramirez and Rafael Palmiero. Two guys we KNOW used. 

As for everyone else, why not? 

Is there a concern that a player can be found out after being inducted? Sure. But it's no reason to keep someone out.

Here is the list for the current BBWAA Hall of Fame 2013 ballot: 
  • Sandy Alomar Jr.
  • Jeff Bagwell
  • Craig Biggio
  • Barry Bonds
  • Jeff Cirillo
  • Royce Clayton
  • Roger Clemens
  • Jeff Conine
  • Steve Finley
  • Julio Franco
  • Shawn Green
  • Roberto Hernandez
  • Ryan Klesko
  • Kenny Lofton
  • Edgar Martinez
  • Don Mattingly
  • Fred McGriff
  • Mark McGwire
  • Jose Mesa
  • Jack Morris
  • Dale Murphy
  • Rafael Palmeiro
  • Mike Piazza
  • Tim Raines
  • Reggie Sanders
  • Curt Schilling
  • Aaron Sele
  • Lee Smith
  • Sammy Sosa
  • Mike Stanton
  • Alan Trammell
  • Larry Walker
  • Todd Walker
  • David Wells
  • Rondell White
  • Bernie Williams
  • Woody Williams

Now, hypothetically, here are my ten selections, hoping one would receive the 75% needed for Cooperstown residency:
  • Barry Bonds
  • Roger Clemens
  • Craig Biggio
  • Sammy Sosa
  • Mike Piazza
  • Jack Morris
  • Edgar Martinez
  • Tim Raines
  • Lee Smith
  • Curt Schilling

Those on the fringe of my selection:
  • Jeff Bagwell
  • Dale Murphy

And of course, a guilty personal wish list:
  • Don Mattingly

Do I think all of them will get in? Of course not. My educated prediction is that Craig Biggio or Jack Morris have the greatest chance this year after all of the skewed thoughts and misconceptions already discussed. 

Will this settle the steroid talk? Absolutely not. It's one of the topics that is endless in so many facets. 

However, the first step toward really, and tangibly, handling the steroid era will occur tomorrow, January 9th, 2013. 

And that seems to be the only thing we do know for sure from the steroid era. 

Recent Favorites

Quick Ponder: Daily Armor

Imagine, if we can see the dents and scratches, the smashes and chaos,  on the daily armor, each of us put on. Just imagine. 

2024 NBA All-Star Weekend Thoughts

There's something wrong with the All-Star Game.  Yeah, we've definitely had this conversation before. Expect to pick up this very discussion (again) in July when Major League Baseball has their version in the "Mid-Summer Classic" when it is the ONLY current topic to bounce around in the stratosphere of sports discourse.  What's wrong with the All-Star Game?!  I'm not dismissing the obvious - yes, the NBA All-Star Game is very much at an alarming point of necessary refinement and change - evaluation is needed. What we saw on Sunday night was not disappointing, but outright embarrassing. Also yes, gone are the days when the game flooded your television screen at a respectable 6:30pm on NBC, and you were wowed by the athleticism and star power of the first half of the game, and treated to what felt like the world's best players playing pickup basketball on the grandest stage.  Now? Not so much. So yeah, we got the message. The outrage - and shock TV and hot t

Dome Pondering Movie Review: Hustle (2022)

What is it about? A long-time scout, Stanley Sugarman, grinds out the life of an NBA scout and the politics of the NBA by taking a chance on a prospect he believes in to change both of their lives.  Who is in it? Adam Sandler - Stanley Sugarman Juancho Hernangomez - Bo Cruz Queen Latifah - Teresa Sugarman Favorite Scene:   Kermit and Bo line up at center court and Kermit begins the trash talk to get inside of Bo's head, eventually taking him off his game.  Favorite Quote:   "I'll say one last inspirational thing to you: they can't kill you if you're already dead." Review:  Hustle sat on "My List" on my Netflix account for quite a long time. Parked on the couch in the middle of the night with a newborn, and jonesing for some hoops, I dove in on what I read (and heard from others) was a "really good film". I'll give away the suspense, I thought Hustle was decent. It felt too cliche and had little depth, but still, a really good film.  The