Skip to main content

Royal Rumble 2013 Review: A Big Change To The Usual Norm

Courtesy: WWE.com
Its the Royal Rumble we all saw coming, but hoped the WWE would prove us wrong.

As we start the road to Wrestlemania and the best time of the year for pro wrestling fans, the road seems to be already set with a headlining match-up of John Cena vs. The Rock II. With a Royal Rumble full of a few for-sures, a handful of wishfuls, lots of filler, and even those who were a waste of time (The Godfather? What was that all about), the WWE seemed to stay the course on the obvious. 

I totally understand the box-office draw a Cena/Rock II would generate, and even the idea of a story of John Cena, the current conquering super hero of the WWE, getting his revenge on The Rock after last year's Wrestlemania defeat, but I really was hoping for a hook, a twist, or even a minor bump before we got to this point.

After building up CM Punk in his 400-plus day reign as champion, it just seems like a sharp right turn into Rock/Cena. 

A big change to what was expected. 

I might be the only one who thought Punk walking into Wrestlemania and headlining against the Undertaker in a streak vs. streak match would've been epic. 

Or even, as self-admitted Ziggler fanatic (Huge fan, as he guy simply reminds me of Curt "Mr. Perfect" Hennig), the idea of him going for the opportunity to unify the belts on the industry's biggest stage. 

But here we are...John Cena vs. The Rock II. 

(Courtesy WWE.com)
Obviously, the loophole of the Shield interfering can cause a twist, but we all know we are heading there again. I like the Rock (who doesn't?), and surely respect John Cena a ton for what he does for the industry. However, I'm not quite sure how to describe it, but the instant change of The Rock as WWE champion (who is rarely on television), and John Cena winning (again!) seems a bit rushed. 

I'm all in for Wrestlemania anyway, as most pro wrestling fans are, but I'm hoping the WWE over the next 70 days can really sell me on a Rock/Cena II at Metlife. 

And it starts immediately, tomorrow night, on Raw. 

Here are some other notes on the Royal Rumble, of course, in classic rhetorical question form: 

How awesome was it to see Bret Hart? 

At the same time, how weird was it to hear him endorse Alberto Del Rio? 

"The Mexican Bret Hart", Really? 

Has Alberto Del Rio's face turn been tough to buy so far? 

Especially when Ricardo Rodriguez is helping him cheat every step of the way?"

Am I the only one who thinks that "Team Rhodes Scholars" should simply just be called, "Rhodes Scholars"? 

Wasn't it weird to see the Rumble not in the main event slot? 

How awesome was it to see Chris Jericho on WWE television again? 

Is Shaemus not one of the hardest working pro wrestlers in the world today? 

Was anyone else pulling for Ziggler to go the distance in the Rumble? 

As soon as Cena had the hot hand, didn't you just know...?

Love him or hate him, doesn't Ryback have one of the best recognizable themes in the industry today? 

Wouldn't you take the WWE's version of their All-Star game (The Royal Rumble) over the lame Pro Bowl every single day, and twice on Thursday?" 

How shocked were you that more people didn't do the usual Wrestlemania point-to-the-sign? 

Didn't you sort of groan when it was down to Orton, Cena, and Ryback? 

John Cena, wins, again? 

Why does The Rock come out after the reigning champion? 

After the lights went out, didn't you just see this getting restarted? 

And don't you just miss Harold Finkel and that wonderful voice stating, "Thissssssssssssss match muuuuuuuuuussssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssst continuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuue!!!?"

Does anyone really beleive Cena chooses to go after Alberto Del Rio to headline Wrestlemania with? 

Who wouldn't want to headline with the Mexican Bret Hart? 

And doesn't it seem weird that The Rock simply handpicked his WWE title match and requested a restart by just showing up a few times a year? 

Are you ready for Rock/Cena II?

Recently Read

Would You Rather: Questions 121-130

This edition of "Would You Rather" is credited to the NBA Would You Rather NBA Account on Instagram ( See Here ). Adding to the fun, this edition (and possibly future ones) are all NBA basketball questions.  121. Who would you rather have on your favorite NBA team - Giannis Antetokounpo or James Harden?  Seeing how I'm a lifelong suffering Knicks fan, the thought of any of these guys in blue and orange is hard to believe. With that said, I'm taking the Greek Freak for this reason - I enjoy watching him play a bit more. Nothing against Harden who is amazing as well, but at times, the ball sticks and that isn't always fun. Plus, I feel like we haven't yet seen a finished Giannis. 122. Would you rather have Giannis Antetokounpo with no driving ability or James Harden with no Three-Point shooting ability?  This is definitely a weird and unique one, but I'll take Harden. Giannis without his strength doesn't offer much. However, if Harden's d...

The Pondering 10 - Yankees All-Decade Team for 2010s

I thought I would stay away from the "all-decade" shenanigans, but I got suckered in after all. Around here, end of year rankings, reviews, and reflections rule, so why not compose a list that embodies it all? And why not put together a list around my beloved Yankees? Especially in a decade in which they DID NOT win the World Series. Gasp! With all of that said, please see below not only my list of the Yankees All-Decade Team (because everyone can filter by position), but also by importance and contribution throughout the decade.

Sunday Sundown Rundown - 8/9/26

The Sunday Sundown Rundown (formerly in the format of "3 Up and 3 Down") is where I share thoughts on three topics that piqued my interest, along with my favorite photo from the week. WNBA Madness Welp, the WNBA has found itself in the middle of a culture war after the satirical (hopefully?) video of Enes Freedom (fka Kanter) declaring for the upcoming WNBA Draft. The WNBA continues to be a super fascinating entity. As likely this country's premier women's league, it has been the root of so many discussions - this one being the "protection of women in sports".  Here are ten super quick ponderings on this:  The WNBA has made its identity over the years as being extremely vocal in the political space. Regardless of your opinion, that positioning puts them at risk for these kinds of stunts.  I've long thought the commissioner, league, someone - anyone? - should have had players, coaches, and all tone down the continued politics. Not to suppress freedom of s...